Beta-blockers post myocardial infarction in 2025: time to let it go?

Recent trials presented at the 2025 ESC Congress have reported apparently conflicting results regarding the role of betablockers after myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with non-severely reduced ejection fraction (EF).Two studies from 2024 had also provided similarly controversial findings.We asked two experts, prof.Eva Prescott and prof.Xavier Rossello, who took part in two of these important trials, to share their insights.How should these trials' results be interpreted and reconciled with previous clinical evidence?The type and dose of betablocker used and the trial design could have influenced the results?Prof. Prescott: The apparent controversy may be less pronounced than it seems.First, the REDUCE-AMI trial 1 specifically included only patients with a left ventricular EF of 50% or higher, whereas the ABYSS 2 should be viewed separately, as it investigated patients a median of more than two years after their index MI -rather than those in the acute or early postinfarction phase.By contrast, trials such as BETAMI-DANBLOCK and REBOOT suggested a protective effect in patients with

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf142
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beta-blockers post myocardial infarction in 2025: time to let it go?

Alessandro Galluzzo, Maurizio Bertaina, Janine Pöss
1 citations
European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
1.39
article

Beta-blockers post myocardial infarction in 2025: time to let it go?

Alessandro Galluzzo, Maurizio Bertaina, Janine Pöss
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Recent trials presented at the 2025 ESC Congress have reported apparently conflicting results regarding the role of betablockers after myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with non-severely reduced ejection fraction (EF).Two studies from 2024 had also provided similarly controversial findings.We asked two experts, prof.Eva Prescott and prof.Xavier Rossello, who took part in two of these important trials, to share their insights.How should these trials' results be interpreted and reconciled with previous clinical evidence?The type and dose of betablocker used and the trial design could have influenced the results?Prof. Prescott: The apparent controversy may be less pronounced than it seems.First, the REDUCE-AMI trial 1 specifically included only patients with a left ventricular EF of 50% or higher, whereas the ABYSS 2 should be viewed separately, as it investigated patients a median of more than two years after their index MI -rather than those in the acute or early postinfarction phase.By contrast, trials such as BETAMI-DANBLOCK and REBOOT suggested a protective effect in patients with

European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular CareVol. 14(12)
Ospedale di Rivoli (IT), Leipzig Heart Institute (DE), Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.