International entrepreneurial mobility and innovation: revisiting the phenomenon and future research directions

Purpose International entrepreneurial mobility (IEM), the cross-border movement of skilled entrepreneurs, facilitates knowledge transfer and innovation. However, the literature is fragmented and inconsistent. This systematic review synthesises findings across categories of mobile entrepreneurs, identifies research gaps, and proposes future directions, thereby advancing a more integrated understanding of international entrepreneurial mobility and innovation. Design/methodology/approach This study adopts a systematic literature review methodology guided by the PRISMA framework to ensure transparency, consistency, and rigour. A comprehensive search was conducted across four major academic databases (Scopus, Web of Science, Emerald, and EBSCO) and supplemented with manual searches of high-impact journals. Following a four-stage PRISMA process–identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion–we systematically narrowed down 1,232 records to a final sample of 67 peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2000 and 2025 that examine the relationship between international entrepreneurial mobility and innovation. Using interpretative synthesis, we coded and analysed these articles by mobility type, theoretical framing, methodological choices, and innovation outcomes to identify patterns, trends, and gaps in the literature. Findings We find that inconsistencies in the literature on international entrepreneurial mobility and innovation arise from overlapping terminologies, contextual biases in assessing innovation, and methodological limitations from single research approaches. To address these issues, we systematically categorise international entrepreneurial mobility into inward mobile entrepreneurs, transnational entrepreneurs, and outward mobile entrepreneurs. Our integrated conceptual framework clarifies the entrepreneurial mobility–innovation nexus and suggests that future studies should adopt systematic entrepreneur categorisation, integrate interdisciplinary perspectives, expand comparative contexts, improve innovation measurement, and investigate underlying mechanisms to provide more comprehensive, policy-relevant insights into IEM's impact on innovation. Research limitations/implications The framework clarifies how international entrepreneurial mobility promotes innovation, offering practical insights for governments to develop policies that attract, support, and promote international entrepreneurs for greater impact. Originality/value This is the first systematic review in entrepreneurial mobility research to unify all categories of internationally mobile entrepreneurs. By categorising them into inward, outward, and transnational groups, and integrating diverse theoretical perspectives, this study clarifies key concepts and provides a strong foundation for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global Mobility The Home of Expatriate Management Research
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jgm-10-2024-0107
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Business and FDI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International entrepreneurial mobility and innovation: revisiting the phenomenon and future research directions

Assylbek Nurgabdeshov, Yen Tran, Nhu Ngoc Nguyen
1 citations
Journal of Global Mobility The Home of Expatriate Management Research
International Business and FDI
2.23
article

International entrepreneurial mobility and innovation: revisiting the phenomenon and future research directions

Assylbek Nurgabdeshov, Yen Tran, Nhu Ngoc Nguyen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose International entrepreneurial mobility (IEM), the cross-border movement of skilled entrepreneurs, facilitates knowledge transfer and innovation. However, the literature is fragmented and inconsistent. This systematic review synthesises findings across categories of mobile entrepreneurs, identifies research gaps, and proposes future directions, thereby advancing a more integrated understanding of international entrepreneurial mobility and innovation. Design/methodology/approach This study adopts a systematic literature review methodology guided by the PRISMA framework to ensure transparency, consistency, and rigour. A comprehensive search was conducted across four major academic databases (Scopus, Web of Science, Emerald, and EBSCO) and supplemented with manual searches of high-impact journals. Following a four-stage PRISMA process–identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion–we systematically narrowed down 1,232 records to a final sample of 67 peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2000 and 2025 that examine the relationship between international entrepreneurial mobility and innovation. Using interpretative synthesis, we coded and analysed these articles by mobility type, theoretical framing, methodological choices, and innovation outcomes to identify patterns, trends, and gaps in the literature. Findings We find that inconsistencies in the literature on international entrepreneurial mobility and innovation arise from overlapping terminologies, contextual biases in assessing innovation, and methodological limitations from single research approaches. To address these issues, we systematically categorise international entrepreneurial mobility into inward mobile entrepreneurs, transnational entrepreneurs, and outward mobile entrepreneurs. Our integrated conceptual framework clarifies the entrepreneurial mobility–innovation nexus and suggests that future studies should adopt systematic entrepreneur categorisation, integrate interdisciplinary perspectives, expand comparative contexts, improve innovation measurement, and investigate underlying mechanisms to provide more comprehensive, policy-relevant insights into IEM's impact on innovation. Research limitations/implications The framework clarifies how international entrepreneurial mobility promotes innovation, offering practical insights for governments to develop policies that attract, support, and promote international entrepreneurs for greater impact. Originality/value This is the first systematic review in entrepreneurial mobility research to unify all categories of internationally mobile entrepreneurs. By categorising them into inward, outward, and transnational groups, and integrating diverse theoretical perspectives, this study clarifies key concepts and provides a strong foundation for future research.

Journal of Global Mobility The Home of Expatriate Management ResearchVol. 13(3)
Heriot-Watt University (GB), Heriot-Watt University Malaysia (MY), Van Lang University (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
International Business and FDI
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.