Gender diversity on corporate boards and sustainability disclosures: a quantile regression approach

Purpose This study aims to examine how ESG disclosure (i.e. sustainability disclosure) responds to board gender diversity using a conditional panel quantile regression approach. Design/methodology/approach Data was obtained from the audited annual reports of 422 firms listed on stock exchanges across 13 countries in Africa for the period 2006–2020. Empirical results were generated using conditional panel quantile regression, but GMM was also used to confirm result robustness. Findings The findings provide evidence that board gender diversity positively affects ESG disclosure. More specifically, the results provide evidence that the economic effect of board gender diversity on ESG disclosure gets pronounced/amplified at different quantile levels, supporting the arguments of critical mass. Research limitations/implications The study used data of 422 firms from 13 African economies for the period 2006-2020 to estimate the heterogeneous effect of board gender diversity on sustainability disclosures. Further research can focus on the interplay between different dimensions of board diversity in affecting corporate and sustainability performance. Practical implications Overall, the result advances the case for firms to pursue gender inclusive strategies/policies that increase the number of women or ensure more gender balance on their boards because it comes with higher benefits as far as sustainability reporting is concerned. In terms of policy, the study reaffirms the need for relevant stakeholders in Africa to come up with a quota policy as far as women representation on boards is concerned. Originality/value Majority of studies, particularly those pertaining to board gender diversity have focused on how a percentage increase or decrease impacts organizational outcomes (where mean effect has been largely considered). This study significantly provides that lower number of women on boards may not bring out the best in them as far as the issue of ESG disclosure in Africa is concerned.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Governance
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-08-2024-0417
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender diversity on corporate boards and sustainability disclosures: a quantile regression approach

Peter Kodjo Luh, Nicholas Asare
1 citations
Corporate Governance
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
article

Gender diversity on corporate boards and sustainability disclosures: a quantile regression approach

Peter Kodjo Luh, Nicholas Asare
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how ESG disclosure (i.e. sustainability disclosure) responds to board gender diversity using a conditional panel quantile regression approach. Design/methodology/approach Data was obtained from the audited annual reports of 422 firms listed on stock exchanges across 13 countries in Africa for the period 2006–2020. Empirical results were generated using conditional panel quantile regression, but GMM was also used to confirm result robustness. Findings The findings provide evidence that board gender diversity positively affects ESG disclosure. More specifically, the results provide evidence that the economic effect of board gender diversity on ESG disclosure gets pronounced/amplified at different quantile levels, supporting the arguments of critical mass. Research limitations/implications The study used data of 422 firms from 13 African economies for the period 2006-2020 to estimate the heterogeneous effect of board gender diversity on sustainability disclosures. Further research can focus on the interplay between different dimensions of board diversity in affecting corporate and sustainability performance. Practical implications Overall, the result advances the case for firms to pursue gender inclusive strategies/policies that increase the number of women or ensure more gender balance on their boards because it comes with higher benefits as far as sustainability reporting is concerned. In terms of policy, the study reaffirms the need for relevant stakeholders in Africa to come up with a quota policy as far as women representation on boards is concerned. Originality/value Majority of studies, particularly those pertaining to board gender diversity have focused on how a percentage increase or decrease impacts organizational outcomes (where mean effect has been largely considered). This study significantly provides that lower number of women on boards may not bring out the best in them as far as the issue of ESG disclosure in Africa is concerned.

Corporate Governance
University of Ghana (GH), Ghana Communication Technology University (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.