Integrated analysis of building form, orientation and envelope factors on energy efficiency in high-rise offices in hot-humid climates

Purpose This study investigates the combined influence of building form, orientation, and envelope parameters on the energy performance of high-rise office buildings in hot-humid climates. Unlike prior research that examines these factors in isolation, this work emphasizes their interdependencies and introduces the Form–Orientation Energy Use Compass, a data-driven tool to guide architects in making informed early-stage design decisions. Design/methodology/approach A comprehensive parametric simulation matrix comprising 51,840 cases was developed using EnergyPlus and DesignBuilder. About 12 idealized building forms, 16 orientations, nine window-to-wall ratios (WWR), five glazing types, three wall types and two roof types were analyzed. Key metrics include total energy use intensity (EUI), cooling loads, thermal comfort (PPD) and visual glare. Results were synthesized to produce the Form–Orientation Energy Use Compass. Findings Building form and orientation exert a significant impact on energy performance and comfort. Compact forms, particularly C- and E-shapes with north-facing orientations (0°–15°), achieve the lowest energy intensities – reducing total EUI by 15–20 than elongated or irregular forms. In contrast, Y-shaped buildings exhibit the highest sensitivity to increasing WWR. The resulting compass visualizes these relationships and provides accessible guidance on optimal design configurations. Research limitations/implications The study is based on simplified geometric prototypes and does not include microclimatic influences, urban shading, or structural constraints. Findings are climate-specific and may not directly generalize to other climatic contexts. Practical implications By translating a complex dataset into an actionable visual tool, this study supports architects and urban designers in integrating energy-conscious decisions into early design phases before detailed optimization workflows. Social implications Promoting energy-efficient form and orientation reduces operational energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to sustainable urban growth and improving occupant comfort in dense urban environments. Originality/value This study uniquely combines multiple interdependent design factors at a large simulation scale, filling a gap in accessible early-stage decision support for high-rise office design in hot-humid climates. The Form–Orientation Energy Use Compass bridges simulation research and practice, enabling evidence-based conceptual design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/arch-02-2025-0092
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated analysis of building form, orientation and envelope factors on energy efficiency in high-rise offices in hot-humid climates

Adel A. Abdou, Rabee M. Reffat
International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Integrated analysis of building form, orientation and envelope factors on energy efficiency in high-rise offices in hot-humid climates

Adel A. Abdou, Rabee M. Reffat
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the combined influence of building form, orientation, and envelope parameters on the energy performance of high-rise office buildings in hot-humid climates. Unlike prior research that examines these factors in isolation, this work emphasizes their interdependencies and introduces the Form–Orientation Energy Use Compass, a data-driven tool to guide architects in making informed early-stage design decisions. Design/methodology/approach A comprehensive parametric simulation matrix comprising 51,840 cases was developed using EnergyPlus and DesignBuilder. About 12 idealized building forms, 16 orientations, nine window-to-wall ratios (WWR), five glazing types, three wall types and two roof types were analyzed. Key metrics include total energy use intensity (EUI), cooling loads, thermal comfort (PPD) and visual glare. Results were synthesized to produce the Form–Orientation Energy Use Compass. Findings Building form and orientation exert a significant impact on energy performance and comfort. Compact forms, particularly C- and E-shapes with north-facing orientations (0°–15°), achieve the lowest energy intensities – reducing total EUI by 15–20 than elongated or irregular forms. In contrast, Y-shaped buildings exhibit the highest sensitivity to increasing WWR. The resulting compass visualizes these relationships and provides accessible guidance on optimal design configurations. Research limitations/implications The study is based on simplified geometric prototypes and does not include microclimatic influences, urban shading, or structural constraints. Findings are climate-specific and may not directly generalize to other climatic contexts. Practical implications By translating a complex dataset into an actionable visual tool, this study supports architects and urban designers in integrating energy-conscious decisions into early design phases before detailed optimization workflows. Social implications Promoting energy-efficient form and orientation reduces operational energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to sustainable urban growth and improving occupant comfort in dense urban environments. Originality/value This study uniquely combines multiple interdependent design factors at a large simulation scale, filling a gap in accessible early-stage decision support for high-rise office design in hot-humid climates. The Form–Orientation Energy Use Compass bridges simulation research and practice, enabling evidence-based conceptual design.

International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN), University of Petroleum (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.