Precautionary Health Behaviours as Potential Confounders in COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Studies

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Precautionary health behaviours (PHBs), such as hand-washing or self-isolation, are non-pharmaceutical interventions used to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission. We investigated the potential confounding by PHBs of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates in a subset of study participants enrolled in id.DRIVE. <b>Methods</b>: The id.DRIVE COVID-19 VE study (formerly COVIDRIVE) is a European multicentre test-negative case-control study estimating COVID-19 VE against hospitalisation due to laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 in patients with severe acute respiratory infection. All adults (≥18 y) prospectively enrolled between 16 November 2021 and 16 August 2023 at three sites were invited to complete a PHB survey capturing indicators of PHBs in the 3 months preceding admission. Fisher's exact test with Bonferroni-adjusted threshold was used to measure the level of association between PHB indicators and both COVID-19 vaccine status and SARS-CoV-2 test result. VE estimates were generated with and without adjustment for PHBs. <b>Results</b>: PHBs were modified over time, with higher precautionary attitudes in the first COVID-19 vaccine booster season (2021-2022) compared to the second one (2022-2023). For the first booster season, PHBs were positively associated with exposures (vaccination status) and outcomes (case or control status). Adjusting for PHBs led to a 6 to 9 percentage-point increase in VE estimates. Conversely, no confounding by PHBs was observed in the second booster season. <b>Conclusions</b>: PHBs should be considered a possible confounder of COVID-19 VE studies. Further research is needed to define when PHBs should be integrated into VE models, as the level of confounding may differ according to the study population and the epidemiological context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccines
Published
2025-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13101047
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Precautionary Health Behaviours as Potential Confounders in COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Studies

Nicolas Praet, Kaatje Bollaerts, Wilhelmine Meeraus, Leonie de Munter et al.
Vaccines
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Precautionary Health Behaviours as Potential Confounders in COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Studies

Nicolas Praet, Kaatje Bollaerts, Wilhelmine Meeraus, Leonie de Munter, Antonio Losa Carmona, Sanskruti Gaikwad, Konstantina Chatzikonstantinidou, Matthew D. Rousculp, Charlotte Martin, Gerrit L. ten Kate, Chloé Wyndham-Thomas, Kok Yew Ngew
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Precautionary health behaviours (PHBs), such as hand-washing or self-isolation, are non-pharmaceutical interventions used to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission. We investigated the potential confounding by PHBs of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates in a subset of study participants enrolled in id.DRIVE. <b>Methods</b>: The id.DRIVE COVID-19 VE study (formerly COVIDRIVE) is a European multicentre test-negative case-control study estimating COVID-19 VE against hospitalisation due to laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 in patients with severe acute respiratory infection. All adults (≥18 y) prospectively enrolled between 16 November 2021 and 16 August 2023 at three sites were invited to complete a PHB survey capturing indicators of PHBs in the 3 months preceding admission. Fisher's exact test with Bonferroni-adjusted threshold was used to measure the level of association between PHB indicators and both COVID-19 vaccine status and SARS-CoV-2 test result. VE estimates were generated with and without adjustment for PHBs. <b>Results</b>: PHBs were modified over time, with higher precautionary attitudes in the first COVID-19 vaccine booster season (2021-2022) compared to the second one (2022-2023). For the first booster season, PHBs were positively associated with exposures (vaccination status) and outcomes (case or control status). Adjusting for PHBs led to a 6 to 9 percentage-point increase in VE estimates. Conversely, no confounding by PHBs was observed in the second booster season. <b>Conclusions</b>: PHBs should be considered a possible confounder of COVID-19 VE studies. Further research is needed to define when PHBs should be integrated into VE models, as the level of confounding may differ according to the study population and the epidemiological context.

VaccinesVol. 13(10)
Janssen (Belgium) (BE), Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (ES), Novavax (United States) (US), AstraZeneca (France) (FR), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (BE), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Pierre (BE), Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (MX), Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Pfizer, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Novavax, Moderna, Bavarian Nordic, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana, Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.