Safety and efficacy of the feed additives l‐cysteine and l‐cysteine hydrochloride (monohydrate and anhydrous) for all animal species (Wacker Chemie AG)

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of l-cysteine and l-cysteine hydrochloride (monohydrate and anhydrous) as flavouring feed additives for all animal species. The use in feed of l-cysteine and l-cysteine hydrochloride (monohydrate and anhydrous), produced by electrochemical reduction of l-cystine, was considered safe for the target species when supplemented at concentrations up to 25 mg/kg complete feed. The FEEDAP Panel considered that the use of l-cysteine and l-cysteine hydrochloride (monohydrate and anhydrous) in animal nutrition is safe for the consumers of products from animals receiving the additives, and to the environment. Regarding user safety, l-cysteine was not considered a skin and eye irritant nor a skin sensitiser. The additives l-cysteine hydrochloride anhydrous and l-cysteine hydrochloride monohydrate are corrosive to eyes and respiratory tract, but no conclusion can be reached on their skin irritation potential; therefore, any exposure is considered a risk. As l-cysteine and l-cysteine hydrochloride are used in food as flavouring compounds, it is expected that they can provide a similar function in feed, and no further demonstration of efficacy is necessary under the proposed conditions of use.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
EFSA Journal
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9689
Primary Topic
Agricultural safety and regulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and efficacy of the feed additives l‐cysteine and l‐cysteine hydrochloride (monohydrate and anhydrous) for all animal species (Wacker Chemie AG)

Ilen Röhe, Alena Pechová, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen et al.
EFSA Journal
Agricultural safety and regulations
article

Safety and efficacy of the feed additives l‐cysteine and l‐cysteine hydrochloride (monohydrate and anhydrous) for all animal species (Wacker Chemie AG)

Ilen Röhe, Alena Pechová, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen, Roberto Edoardo Villa, Katerina Theodoridou, Francesca Marcon, Ronette Gehring, Carlo Nebbia, Joana P. Firmino, Mojca Durjava, Matteo Lorenzo Innocenti, Boet Glandorf, Giovanna Azimonti, Birgit Dusemund, Montserrat Anguita
article en

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of l-cysteine and l-cysteine hydrochloride (monohydrate and anhydrous) as flavouring feed additives for all animal species. The use in feed of l-cysteine and l-cysteine hydrochloride (monohydrate and anhydrous), produced by electrochemical reduction of l-cystine, was considered safe for the target species when supplemented at concentrations up to 25 mg/kg complete feed. The FEEDAP Panel considered that the use of l-cysteine and l-cysteine hydrochloride (monohydrate and anhydrous) in animal nutrition is safe for the consumers of products from animals receiving the additives, and to the environment. Regarding user safety, l-cysteine was not considered a skin and eye irritant nor a skin sensitiser. The additives l-cysteine hydrochloride anhydrous and l-cysteine hydrochloride monohydrate are corrosive to eyes and respiratory tract, but no conclusion can be reached on their skin irritation potential; therefore, any exposure is considered a risk. As l-cysteine and l-cysteine hydrochloride are used in food as flavouring compounds, it is expected that they can provide a similar function in feed, and no further demonstration of efficacy is necessary under the proposed conditions of use.

EFSA JournalVol. 23(10)
European Food Safety Authority
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Agricultural safety and regulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.