Lack of Diversity in Minimally Invasive Bladder Outlet Surgery Among Urologists in the United States.

In 2019, a sample of 2747 Medicare providers performed bladder outlet surgery nationwide. 81% performed one type of procedure, whereas only one performed more than three types. TURP was favored across all regions. TURP and GL volume decreased while UL increased over the study period; RZ and LEP were less common. Two regions, the Northeast and West, demonstrated significantly greater procedural diversity, but differences could not be attributed to provider age or rurality at the national level. In the regional analysis, however, rural areas with less variation in provider age had slower uptake of newer procedures (p = 0.022), and urban areas with more variation in provider age demonstrated more rapid uptake (p = 0.008). Conclusions: While TURP continues to be the most common bladder outlet procedure, there is steady adoption of new technologies with complex patterns of uptake based on provider age and rurality. Understanding the dissemination of new procedures and the appropriate role of procedural diversification may help to improve both access to and quality of care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-11-03
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lack of Diversity in Minimally Invasive Bladder Outlet Surgery Among Urologists in the United States.

Anna Shlimak, Borivoj Golijanin, Andrew J. Tompkins, Emma Waddell et al.
PubMed
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Lack of Diversity in Minimally Invasive Bladder Outlet Surgery Among Urologists in the United States.

Anna Shlimak, Borivoj Golijanin, Andrew J. Tompkins, Emma Waddell, Stephen Schmit, Rebecca Ortiz, William Connolly, Elias S. Hyams, Joshua Ray Tanzer
article en

Abstract

In 2019, a sample of 2747 Medicare providers performed bladder outlet surgery nationwide. 81% performed one type of procedure, whereas only one performed more than three types. TURP was favored across all regions. TURP and GL volume decreased while UL increased over the study period; RZ and LEP were less common. Two regions, the Northeast and West, demonstrated significantly greater procedural diversity, but differences could not be attributed to provider age or rurality at the national level. In the regional analysis, however, rural areas with less variation in provider age had slower uptake of newer procedures (p = 0.022), and urban areas with more variation in provider age demonstrated more rapid uptake (p = 0.008). Conclusions: While TURP continues to be the most common bladder outlet procedure, there is steady adoption of new technologies with complex patterns of uptake based on provider age and rurality. Understanding the dissemination of new procedures and the appropriate role of procedural diversification may help to improve both access to and quality of care.

PubMedVol. 108(11)
Brown University (US), Miriam Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.