Lack of Diversity in Minimally Invasive Bladder Outlet Surgery Among Urologists in the United States.
In 2019, a sample of 2747 Medicare providers performed bladder outlet surgery nationwide. 81% performed one type of procedure, whereas only one performed more than three types. TURP was favored across all regions. TURP and GL volume decreased while UL increased over the study period; RZ and LEP were less common. Two regions, the Northeast and West, demonstrated significantly greater procedural diversity, but differences could not be attributed to provider age or rurality at the national level. In the regional analysis, however, rural areas with less variation in provider age had slower uptake of newer procedures (p = 0.022), and urban areas with more variation in provider age demonstrated more rapid uptake (p = 0.008). Conclusions: While TURP continues to be the most common bladder outlet procedure, there is steady adoption of new technologies with complex patterns of uptake based on provider age and rurality. Understanding the dissemination of new procedures and the appropriate role of procedural diversification may help to improve both access to and quality of care.
Authors
- Anna Shlimak
- Borivoj Golijanin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3933-1598)
- Andrew J. Tompkins (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1011-5728)
- Emma Waddell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8863-0335)
- Stephen Schmit (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3901-4349)
- Rebecca Ortiz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1586-8630)
- William Connolly
- Elias S. Hyams (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8346-7388)
- Joshua Ray Tanzer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5393-2974)
Institutions
- Brown University (US)
- Miriam Hospital (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PubMed
- Published
- 2025-11-03
- Primary Topic
- Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00