Is it possible to identify genotypes underlying resistant phenotypes in Gram-negative pathogens?

Linking genotypes to resistant phenotypes in Gram-negative pathogens remains complex. While phenotypic AST ensures reliability for therapy, genotypic methods provide unprecedented insight into resistance mechanisms and epidemiology. Discrepancies between the two highlight the need for integrated diagnostic platforms that combine functional and genomic perspectives. Artificial intelligence-driven predictive models and curated resistance databases hold promise for improving accuracy, but widespread adoption requires robust datasets, clinical validation, and harmonized interpretative frameworks. Ultimately, integrating phenotypic and genotypic data represents the most effective strategy to provide mechanism-informed, clinically actionable diagnostics for antimicrobial resistance management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/qco.0000000000001158
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is it possible to identify genotypes underlying resistant phenotypes in Gram-negative pathogens?

Julia Serrano‐Lobo, Almudena Burillo, Emilio Bouza, Patricia Muñoz
1 citations
Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
0.59
article

Is it possible to identify genotypes underlying resistant phenotypes in Gram-negative pathogens?

Julia Serrano‐Lobo, Almudena Burillo, Emilio Bouza, Patricia Muñoz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Linking genotypes to resistant phenotypes in Gram-negative pathogens remains complex. While phenotypic AST ensures reliability for therapy, genotypic methods provide unprecedented insight into resistance mechanisms and epidemiology. Discrepancies between the two highlight the need for integrated diagnostic platforms that combine functional and genomic perspectives. Artificial intelligence-driven predictive models and curated resistance databases hold promise for improving accuracy, but widespread adoption requires robust datasets, clinical validation, and harmonized interpretative frameworks. Ultimately, integrating phenotypic and genotypic data represents the most effective strategy to provide mechanism-informed, clinically actionable diagnostics for antimicrobial resistance management.

Current Opinion in Infectious DiseasesVol. 38(6)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
0.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is it possible to identify genotypes underlying resistant phenotypes in Gram-negative pathogens? — Julia Serrano‐Lobo, Almudena Burillo, et al. · Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS