Understanding and redressing imbalances for South-North collaborations in energy and development research

The Global South-Global North divide is widely defined using the Brandt Line, which proposed a geographical divide between more developed countries in the North and less developed countries in the South. Inequities in South-North research collaborations manifest in different ways and at different stages. Many researchers engaged in energy and development research are involved in collaborative projects with research partners across the divide. To ensure success, these collaborations must be inclusive and balanced. Researchers and multilateral organisations are starting to take notice of the potential negative impacts of unbalanced research collaborations. Critical assessments of these imbalances are scarce and there is a knowledge gap of ways to create more inclusive environments that allow researchers from the Global South to contribute solutions for challenges in their local contexts. Through workshops and a survey of researchers engaged in energy and development research, this paper attempts to partially fill this gap by investigating the challenges in collaborative projects faced by researchers in the Global South and Global North. The main findings show significant differences in the research experience of the two groups of researchers with respect to administrative burdens, access to resources, research roles and communication. We present several recommendations for how to address the inequities in collaborative research projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UCL Open Environment
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444/ucloe.1974
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Health and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding and redressing imbalances for South-North collaborations in energy and development research

Yacob Mulugetta, Tiago Diniz, Penlope Yaguma, Tash Perros et al.
1 citations
UCL Open Environment
Global Health and Surgery
1.88
article

Understanding and redressing imbalances for South-North collaborations in energy and development research

Yacob Mulugetta, Tiago Diniz, Penlope Yaguma, Tash Perros, Jennifer Cronin, Alexandre Szklo, Harshavardhan Jatkar, Muez Ali, Pamela Fennell, Lilia Caiado Couto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Global South-Global North divide is widely defined using the Brandt Line, which proposed a geographical divide between more developed countries in the North and less developed countries in the South. Inequities in South-North research collaborations manifest in different ways and at different stages. Many researchers engaged in energy and development research are involved in collaborative projects with research partners across the divide. To ensure success, these collaborations must be inclusive and balanced. Researchers and multilateral organisations are starting to take notice of the potential negative impacts of unbalanced research collaborations. Critical assessments of these imbalances are scarce and there is a knowledge gap of ways to create more inclusive environments that allow researchers from the Global South to contribute solutions for challenges in their local contexts. Through workshops and a survey of researchers engaged in energy and development research, this paper attempts to partially fill this gap by investigating the challenges in collaborative projects faced by researchers in the Global South and Global North. The main findings show significant differences in the research experience of the two groups of researchers with respect to administrative burdens, access to resources, research roles and communication. We present several recommendations for how to address the inequities in collaborative research projects.

UCL Open EnvironmentVol. 7(1)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Eletrobras (Brazil) (BR), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Global Health and Surgery
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.