On the argument against abortion from African normative personhood

One influential understanding of the African normative conception of personhood says that humans have moral status because they have the capacity for sympathy. It is tempting to think that this account of moral status forbids abortion because foetuses have the potential for the capacity for sympathy, which guarantees them a right to life. I outline the strongest possible argument along these lines before observing that it faces some serious challenges. First, it does not do enough to explain why the mere potential for the capacity for sympathy is valuable. Second, it fails to explain why partial moral status guarantees a foetus the right to life in all circumstances unless an extreme form of pacificism is assumed. Third, it does not do an adequate job of explaining the moral status of either disabled foetuses or adult humans who will never have the potential for the capacity for sympathy. I conclude that it is doubtful that any account of African personhood will be able to successfully show that abortion is always impermissible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arụmarụka Journal of Conversational Thinking
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4314/ajct.v5i1.7
Primary Topic
African cultural and philosophical studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the argument against abortion from African normative personhood

Kirk Lougheed
Arụmarụka Journal of Conversational Thinking
African cultural and philosophical studies
article

On the argument against abortion from African normative personhood

Kirk Lougheed
article en

Abstract

One influential understanding of the African normative conception of personhood says that humans have moral status because they have the capacity for sympathy. It is tempting to think that this account of moral status forbids abortion because foetuses have the potential for the capacity for sympathy, which guarantees them a right to life. I outline the strongest possible argument along these lines before observing that it faces some serious challenges. First, it does not do enough to explain why the mere potential for the capacity for sympathy is valuable. Second, it fails to explain why partial moral status guarantees a foetus the right to life in all circumstances unless an extreme form of pacificism is assumed. Third, it does not do an adequate job of explaining the moral status of either disabled foetuses or adult humans who will never have the potential for the capacity for sympathy. I conclude that it is doubtful that any account of African personhood will be able to successfully show that abortion is always impermissible.

Arụmarụka Journal of Conversational ThinkingVol. 5(1)
LCC International University (LT), University of Pretoria (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
African cultural and philosophical studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the argument against abortion from African normative personhood — Kirk Lougheed · Arụmarụka Journal of Conversational Thinking (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS