Her-storicity and epistemic justice

In this paper, I explore Mesembe Edet’s idea of her-storicity, which entails the recognition of women’s perspectives, experiences, and histories that have often been marginalized and excluded in epistemic space, to demonstrate how it could address the problem of epistemic injustice against women. The problem of epistemic marginalization and exclusion of women’s perspectives in African philosophy often leaves women in a disadvantaged position to interpret and derive meaning from their lived experiences. While various scholars have explored solutions from diverse angles, the historiographical perspective remains underexplored in tackling this issue. Thus, building on Edet’s thesis of her-storicity, I contend that her-storicity, if properly realized, can address the problem of epistemic marginalization of women because it is erected on the foundation of inclusivity and complementarity. While critics may raise concerns about her-storicity compromising rigor through subjective bias, I demonstrate that its capacity to embrace various epistemic viewpoints enhances its credibility as an alternative solution to issues of epistemic justice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Arụmarụka Journal of Conversational Thinking
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4314/ajct.v5i1.5
Primary Topic
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Her-storicity and epistemic justice

Emmanuel Bassey Eyo
Arụmarụka Journal of Conversational Thinking
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
article

Her-storicity and epistemic justice

Emmanuel Bassey Eyo
article en

Abstract

In this paper, I explore Mesembe Edet’s idea of her-storicity, which entails the recognition of women’s perspectives, experiences, and histories that have often been marginalized and excluded in epistemic space, to demonstrate how it could address the problem of epistemic injustice against women. The problem of epistemic marginalization and exclusion of women’s perspectives in African philosophy often leaves women in a disadvantaged position to interpret and derive meaning from their lived experiences. While various scholars have explored solutions from diverse angles, the historiographical perspective remains underexplored in tackling this issue. Thus, building on Edet’s thesis of her-storicity, I contend that her-storicity, if properly realized, can address the problem of epistemic marginalization of women because it is erected on the foundation of inclusivity and complementarity. While critics may raise concerns about her-storicity compromising rigor through subjective bias, I demonstrate that its capacity to embrace various epistemic viewpoints enhances its credibility as an alternative solution to issues of epistemic justice.

Arụmarụka Journal of Conversational ThinkingVol. 5(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.