Intraoperative management of locally advanced mediastinal masses: options and role of extracorporeal cardio-respiratory support through a case-series evaluation

Background: Mediastinal masses are a heterogeneous group of disorders that often require a radical surgical treatment. However, especially for large masses involving or compressing airways and/or vascular structures, surgery may be complicated by a variety of cardiorespiratory complications possibly occurring during patient positioning, oro-tracheal intubation, induction, surgical manipulation and extubation. In some situations, an extracorporeal cardio-respiratory support (C-R support) may be necessary to safely perform surgery. The choice of the most appropriate extracorporeal C-R support is a complex indication, depending on patients’ conditions, position and characteristics of the mediastinal mass. Up to date, there are no specific guidelines on the extracorporeal C-R support management in those patients. We aim to propose a schematic approach to the different extracorporeal C-R support strategies through a series of exemplifying cases. Case Description: Four representative cases of advanced mediastinal mass undergoing surgical treatment with different extracorporeal C-R support systems have been collected: one required central cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for hemodynamic instability; one had an emergency peripheral CPB for aortic injury; one an elective extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for respiratory failure during pneumonectomy. In our experience, if a hemodynamic impairment occurs, CPB or veno-arterial ECMO should be preferred over veno-venous ECMO that should be reserved to pure respiratory impairment. CPB is mandatory if a bloodless surgical field is needed or if a severe bleeding required a massive hemodynamic support. Finally, the mass position and great vessels involvement could affect the choice of a peripheral approach over a central cannulation. Conclusions: The use of C-R support systems may be mandatory in case of large mediastinal masses in order to perform a safe surgery. We developed a schematic flowchart to guide the choice of the most adequate C-R support depending on patient status and mass characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Challenges in Thoracic Surgery
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21037/ccts-25-33
Primary Topic
Tracheal and airway disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intraoperative management of locally advanced mediastinal masses: options and role of extracorporeal cardio-respiratory support through a case-series evaluation

Daniele Diso, Franco Ruberto, Camilla Poggi, Massimiliano Bassi et al.
Current Challenges in Thoracic Surgery
Tracheal and airway disorders
article

Intraoperative management of locally advanced mediastinal masses: options and role of extracorporeal cardio-respiratory support through a case-series evaluation

Daniele Diso, Franco Ruberto, Camilla Poggi, Massimiliano Bassi, Anastasia Centofanti, Tiziano De Giacomo, Veronica Zullino, Jacopo Vannucci, A. Evangelista, Marco Anile, Federico Venuta, Beatrice Zacchini, Emilia Mottola, Valerio Sebastianelli
article en

Abstract

Background: Mediastinal masses are a heterogeneous group of disorders that often require a radical surgical treatment. However, especially for large masses involving or compressing airways and/or vascular structures, surgery may be complicated by a variety of cardiorespiratory complications possibly occurring during patient positioning, oro-tracheal intubation, induction, surgical manipulation and extubation. In some situations, an extracorporeal cardio-respiratory support (C-R support) may be necessary to safely perform surgery. The choice of the most appropriate extracorporeal C-R support is a complex indication, depending on patients’ conditions, position and characteristics of the mediastinal mass. Up to date, there are no specific guidelines on the extracorporeal C-R support management in those patients. We aim to propose a schematic approach to the different extracorporeal C-R support strategies through a series of exemplifying cases. Case Description: Four representative cases of advanced mediastinal mass undergoing surgical treatment with different extracorporeal C-R support systems have been collected: one required central cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for hemodynamic instability; one had an emergency peripheral CPB for aortic injury; one an elective extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for respiratory failure during pneumonectomy. In our experience, if a hemodynamic impairment occurs, CPB or veno-arterial ECMO should be preferred over veno-venous ECMO that should be reserved to pure respiratory impairment. CPB is mandatory if a bloodless surgical field is needed or if a severe bleeding required a massive hemodynamic support. Finally, the mass position and great vessels involvement could affect the choice of a peripheral approach over a central cannulation. Conclusions: The use of C-R support systems may be mandatory in case of large mediastinal masses in order to perform a safe surgery. We developed a schematic flowchart to guide the choice of the most adequate C-R support depending on patient status and mass characteristics.

Current Challenges in Thoracic SurgeryVol. 7
University of Perugia (IT), Policlinico Umberto I (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Tracheal and airway disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.