Interpenetration on the Field of Śūnyatā: Nishitani and Buddhist Metaphysics

Abstract: Interpenetration, a central idea in Huayan Buddhist metaphysics, is commonly understood as the mutual dependence of all things. However, in Religion and Nothingness , Keiji Nishitani proposes that while everything is interdependent, each entity is also absolutely independent. Furthermore, Nishitani attributes a “non-objective” mode of being to entities in interpenetration. These tensions between dependence and independence, and objecthood and nonobjecthood, reveal the uniqueness of Nishitani’s view and the limitations in the traditional understanding of interpenetration. This article explores these tensions within Nishitani, contrasts Nishitani’s approach to interpenetration with both the common view and Fazang’s view, addresses Nishitani’s treatment of contradictory utterances, and reflects on the relation between metaphysics and ethics in Buddhist philosophy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy East and West
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2025.a973415
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpenetration on the Field of Śūnyatā: Nishitani and Buddhist Metaphysics

Q. H. Qin
Philosophy East and West
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

Interpenetration on the Field of Śūnyatā: Nishitani and Buddhist Metaphysics

Q. H. Qin
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Interpenetration, a central idea in Huayan Buddhist metaphysics, is commonly understood as the mutual dependence of all things. However, in Religion and Nothingness , Keiji Nishitani proposes that while everything is interdependent, each entity is also absolutely independent. Furthermore, Nishitani attributes a “non-objective” mode of being to entities in interpenetration. These tensions between dependence and independence, and objecthood and nonobjecthood, reveal the uniqueness of Nishitani’s view and the limitations in the traditional understanding of interpenetration. This article explores these tensions within Nishitani, contrasts Nishitani’s approach to interpenetration with both the common view and Fazang’s view, addresses Nishitani’s treatment of contradictory utterances, and reflects on the relation between metaphysics and ethics in Buddhist philosophy.

Philosophy East and WestVol. 75(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.