Storage games

ABSTRACT We study a long‐horizon, oligopolistic market with random shocks to demand that can be arbitraged by two storage operators with finite capacity. This problem applies to any storable commodity—that is, most commodities. Because the arbitrage spread is so sensitive to market power, storage operators face strong incentives to restrain quantities by tacitly colluding. This cooperation takes new forms thanks to the multiplicity of actions they must take: selling, buying, or both. We construct payoff‐maximizing equilibria of this stochastic game, and uncover a new form of Partial Cooperation that trades off quantities and delay. While collusive, Partial Cooperation delivers higher consumer surplus thanks to the market power effect. Head‐on competition is not always an equilibrium of the long‐horizon game when market power becomes large enough. We draw implications for policy and suggest poorly competitive storage is a negative externality to the development of the underlying commodity—for example, renewable energy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The RAND Journal of Economics
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.70015
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Storage games

Guillaume Roger, Sergei Balakin
The RAND Journal of Economics
Game Theory and Applications
article

Storage games

Guillaume Roger, Sergei Balakin
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We study a long‐horizon, oligopolistic market with random shocks to demand that can be arbitraged by two storage operators with finite capacity. This problem applies to any storable commodity—that is, most commodities. Because the arbitrage spread is so sensitive to market power, storage operators face strong incentives to restrain quantities by tacitly colluding. This cooperation takes new forms thanks to the multiplicity of actions they must take: selling, buying, or both. We construct payoff‐maximizing equilibria of this stochastic game, and uncover a new form of Partial Cooperation that trades off quantities and delay. While collusive, Partial Cooperation delivers higher consumer surplus thanks to the market power effect. Head‐on competition is not always an equilibrium of the long‐horizon game when market power becomes large enough. We draw implications for policy and suggest poorly competitive storage is a negative externality to the development of the underlying commodity—for example, renewable energy.

The RAND Journal of Economics
Monash University (AU)
Monash University
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Game Theory and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.