Quantification of Urea in Electrocatalytic Systems

Electrochemical urea synthesis (EUS) from CO 2 and nitrates has recently emerged as a more sustainable alternative to nitrogen fertilizers derived from fossil fuels. Indeed, using captured CO 2 and nitrates from wastewater can offer environmental benefits compared to conventional methods. On the road to EUS technology development, its accurate and reliable quantification is an undeniable cornerstone. As this field is still in its infancy, with very low product concentration and numerous side‐products, EUS product quantification is challenging, with reported false positives and negatives. Despite the consensus that at least two methods ought to be used, the selection of the most suitable methods and quantification protocols is an open topic in the scientific community. This work presents a comparative study of the most common methods, highlighting their advantages, limitations, and recent developments, aiming to provide valuable insights to guide the advancement of this emerging field and facilitate the upscaling of sustainable fertilizer production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemElectroChem
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202500302
Primary Topic
Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantification of Urea in Electrocatalytic Systems

Emiliana Fabbri, Mateusz Wojtas, Marija R. Zorić, Thomas J. Schmidt
ChemElectroChem
Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
article

Quantification of Urea in Electrocatalytic Systems

Emiliana Fabbri, Mateusz Wojtas, Marija R. Zorić, Thomas J. Schmidt
article en

Abstract

Electrochemical urea synthesis (EUS) from CO 2 and nitrates has recently emerged as a more sustainable alternative to nitrogen fertilizers derived from fossil fuels. Indeed, using captured CO 2 and nitrates from wastewater can offer environmental benefits compared to conventional methods. On the road to EUS technology development, its accurate and reliable quantification is an undeniable cornerstone. As this field is still in its infancy, with very low product concentration and numerous side‐products, EUS product quantification is challenging, with reported false positives and negatives. Despite the consensus that at least two methods ought to be used, the selection of the most suitable methods and quantification protocols is an open topic in the scientific community. This work presents a comparative study of the most common methods, highlighting their advantages, limitations, and recent developments, aiming to provide valuable insights to guide the advancement of this emerging field and facilitate the upscaling of sustainable fertilizer production.

ChemElectroChemVol. 12(22)
Paul Scherrer Institute (CH), ETH Zurich (CH), Institute for Biomedical Engineering (CH)
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Paul Scherrer Institut
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.