Research on Residual Strength and Evaluation Methods of Aircraft Panel Structures with Perforations

This study, via a combination of experiments and numerical simulations, investigates the structural tensile failure mechanisms of battle-damaged aluminum alloy flat panels and stiffened panels, the variation in their residual strength with hole characteristics, and modifies the calculation formula of the net-section failure criterion for evaluating damaged panels’ residual strength. Experimental and simulation results demonstrate that hole size and position exert a significant influence on panels’ residual strength: larger hole size and greater eccentricity both diminish load-bearing capacity, stiffened panels with web damage exhibit lower load-bearing capacity than those with flange damage. Different hole positions induce edge effects that alter stress distribution at the hole cross-section. Introducing a stress averaging coefficient modifies the residual strength evaluation of flat panels, which is further extended to stiffened panels with high result accuracy. This study presents a rapid method for evaluating damaged panels’ residual strength and serves as a reference for aircraft battle damage repair (ABDR) design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerospace
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12110950
Primary Topic
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on Residual Strength and Evaluation Methods of Aircraft Panel Structures with Perforations

A. B. Ren, Tao An, Yi‐Tao Wang, Liying Ma et al.
Aerospace
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
article

Research on Residual Strength and Evaluation Methods of Aircraft Panel Structures with Perforations

A. B. Ren, Tao An, Yi‐Tao Wang, Liying Ma, Teng Zhang
article en

Abstract

This study, via a combination of experiments and numerical simulations, investigates the structural tensile failure mechanisms of battle-damaged aluminum alloy flat panels and stiffened panels, the variation in their residual strength with hole characteristics, and modifies the calculation formula of the net-section failure criterion for evaluating damaged panels’ residual strength. Experimental and simulation results demonstrate that hole size and position exert a significant influence on panels’ residual strength: larger hole size and greater eccentricity both diminish load-bearing capacity, stiffened panels with web damage exhibit lower load-bearing capacity than those with flange damage. Different hole positions induce edge effects that alter stress distribution at the hole cross-section. Introducing a stress averaging coefficient modifies the residual strength evaluation of flat panels, which is further extended to stiffened panels with high result accuracy. This study presents a rapid method for evaluating damaged panels’ residual strength and serves as a reference for aircraft battle damage repair (ABDR) design.

AerospaceVol. 12(11)
Air Force Engineering University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Research on Residual Strength and Evaluation Methods of Aircraft Panel Structures with Perforations — A. B. Ren, Tao An, et al. · Aerospace (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS