General and Special Education Teachers’ Advice Networks: A Social Network Analysis

Meaningful professional connections are crucial to enacting inclusive education policy. Yet, extant qualitative research suggests that special education teachers’ (SETs) professional experiences are often marked by isolation, devaluation, and subordination. Informed by homophily theory, in the present study, we extend beyond SETs’ individual experiences to take an organizational perspective. We explore patterns of advice and information seeking, providing, and brokering between general education teachers (GETs) and SETs regarding English language arts (ELA) and mathematics using social network data from 14 elementary schools in one district. Our results suggest that SETs were differently positioned in content area networks, the work necessary to be a part of these networks tended to fall on SETs, and GETs tended to have a slightly greater influence on their ELA networks than SETs. Results have implications for efforts to support and sustain meaningful connections between teachers, a crucial aspect of collaboration for inclusive practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teacher Education and Special Education The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064251382888
Primary Topic
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

General and Special Education Teachers’ Advice Networks: A Social Network Analysis

Christopher Redding, Hannah Morris Mathews, Tracy M. Sweet, Danielle Jeannite
Teacher Education and Special Education The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
article

General and Special Education Teachers’ Advice Networks: A Social Network Analysis

Christopher Redding, Hannah Morris Mathews, Tracy M. Sweet, Danielle Jeannite
article en

Abstract

Meaningful professional connections are crucial to enacting inclusive education policy. Yet, extant qualitative research suggests that special education teachers’ (SETs) professional experiences are often marked by isolation, devaluation, and subordination. Informed by homophily theory, in the present study, we extend beyond SETs’ individual experiences to take an organizational perspective. We explore patterns of advice and information seeking, providing, and brokering between general education teachers (GETs) and SETs regarding English language arts (ELA) and mathematics using social network data from 14 elementary schools in one district. Our results suggest that SETs were differently positioned in content area networks, the work necessary to be a part of these networks tended to fall on SETs, and GETs tended to have a slightly greater influence on their ELA networks than SETs. Results have implications for efforts to support and sustain meaningful connections between teachers, a crucial aspect of collaboration for inclusive practice.

Teacher Education and Special Education The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children
University of Florida (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.