Custom Generative Artificial Intelligence Tutors in Action: An Experimental Evaluation of Prompt Strategies in STEM Education

The integration of generative artificial intelligence, particularly large language models, into education presents opportunities for both personalised learning and pedagogical challenges. This study focuses on electrical engineering laboratory education. We developed a configurable prototype of a generative artificial intelligence powered tutoring tool, implemented it in an undergraduate electrical engineering laboratory course, and analysed 208 student–tutoring tool interactions using a mixed-methods approach that combined research team evaluation with learner feedback. The findings show that student prompts were predominantly procedural or factual, with limited conceptual or metacognitive engagement. Structured prompt styles produced clearer and more coherent responses and were rated the highest by students, while approaches aimed at fostering reasoning and reflection were valued mainly by the research team for their pedagogical depth. This contrast highlights a consistent preference–pedagogy gap, indicating the need to embed stronger instructional guidance into artificial intelligence tutoring. To bridge this gap, a promising direction is the development of pedagogically enriched AI tutors that integrate features such as adaptive prompting, hybrid strategy blending, and retrieval-augmented feedback to balance clarity, engagement, and depth. The results provide practical and conceptual value relevant to educators, developers, and researchers interested in artificial intelligence tutors that are both engaging and pedagogically sound. For educators, the study clarifies how students interact with tutors, helping align artificial intelligence use with instructional goals. For developers, it highlights the importance of designing systems that combine usability with educational value. For researchers, the findings identify directions for further study on how design choices in artificial intelligence tutoring affect learning processes and pedagogical alignment across STEM contexts. On a broader level, the study contributes to a more transparent, equitable, and sustainable integration of generative AI in education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219508
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Custom Generative Artificial Intelligence Tutors in Action: An Experimental Evaluation of Prompt Strategies in STEM Education

David Rihtaršič, Rok Gabrovšek
6 citations
Sustainability
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
14.89
article

Custom Generative Artificial Intelligence Tutors in Action: An Experimental Evaluation of Prompt Strategies in STEM Education

David Rihtaršič, Rok Gabrovšek
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The integration of generative artificial intelligence, particularly large language models, into education presents opportunities for both personalised learning and pedagogical challenges. This study focuses on electrical engineering laboratory education. We developed a configurable prototype of a generative artificial intelligence powered tutoring tool, implemented it in an undergraduate electrical engineering laboratory course, and analysed 208 student–tutoring tool interactions using a mixed-methods approach that combined research team evaluation with learner feedback. The findings show that student prompts were predominantly procedural or factual, with limited conceptual or metacognitive engagement. Structured prompt styles produced clearer and more coherent responses and were rated the highest by students, while approaches aimed at fostering reasoning and reflection were valued mainly by the research team for their pedagogical depth. This contrast highlights a consistent preference–pedagogy gap, indicating the need to embed stronger instructional guidance into artificial intelligence tutoring. To bridge this gap, a promising direction is the development of pedagogically enriched AI tutors that integrate features such as adaptive prompting, hybrid strategy blending, and retrieval-augmented feedback to balance clarity, engagement, and depth. The results provide practical and conceptual value relevant to educators, developers, and researchers interested in artificial intelligence tutors that are both engaging and pedagogically sound. For educators, the study clarifies how students interact with tutors, helping align artificial intelligence use with instructional goals. For developers, it highlights the importance of designing systems that combine usability with educational value. For researchers, the findings identify directions for further study on how design choices in artificial intelligence tutoring affect learning processes and pedagogical alignment across STEM contexts. On a broader level, the study contributes to a more transparent, equitable, and sustainable integration of generative AI in education.

SustainabilityVol. 17(21)
University of Ljubljana (SI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
14.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.