Assessment of Compliance with Integral Conservation Principles in Chemically Reactive Flows Using rhoCentralRfFoam

Reliable simulations of any flow require proper preservation of the fundamental principles governing the mechanics of its motion, whether in differential or integral form. When these principles are solved in differential form, discretization schemes introduce errors by transforming the continuous physical domain into a discrete representation that only approximates it. This paper analyzes the numerical performance of the solver for supersonic chemically active flows, rhoCentralRfFoam, using integral conservation principles of mass, momentum, energy, and chemical species as a validation tool in a classical test case with a highly refined mesh under nonlinear pre-established reference conditions. The analysis is conducted on this specific test case; however, the methodology presented here can be applied to any problem under study. It may serve as an a posteriori verification tool or be integrated into the solver’s workflow, enabling automatic verification of conservation at each time step. The resulting deviations are evaluated, and it is observed that the numerical errors remain below 0.25%, even in cases with a high degree of nonlinearity. These results provide preliminary validation of the solver’s accuracy, as well as its ability to capture physically consistent solutions using only information generated internally by the solver for validation. This represents a significant advantage over validation methods that require external comparison with reference solutions, numerical benchmarks, or exact solutions.