Socialized Systems of Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Roles of Technological Organic Intellectuals

This conceptual review article critically examines the systemic features and contradictions of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and the ‘opportunity/danger paradox’ in the development and deployment of large language models (LLMs). The paradox and its potential resolution are explored through a political–economy–ecology framework. Through new developments in neo-Gramscian analysis, the article conceptualizes GenAI as embedded within competing dominant and subordinate technological blocs within the context of Platform Capitalism 2.0, evolving as the latest phase of Computational Capitalism. In response, an alternative horizontally organized, multi-layered socialized system of GenAI is proposed to ultimately resolve the paradox. The article utilizes Lury’s concept of problem spaces and recomposed research problems to explore transitioning to this socialized system based on constructing multiple mediating layers of the alternative technological bloc, mediated by alliances of progressive technological organic intellectuals exercising a technological organic intellect. The conclusion addresses the challenges of passive revolution effects and transitioning compounded by the phenomenon of compressed technological time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13110944
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socialized Systems of Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Roles of Technological Organic Intellectuals

Ken Spours
1 citations
Systems
Digital Education and Society
3.25
article

Socialized Systems of Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Roles of Technological Organic Intellectuals

Ken Spours
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This conceptual review article critically examines the systemic features and contradictions of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and the ‘opportunity/danger paradox’ in the development and deployment of large language models (LLMs). The paradox and its potential resolution are explored through a political–economy–ecology framework. Through new developments in neo-Gramscian analysis, the article conceptualizes GenAI as embedded within competing dominant and subordinate technological blocs within the context of Platform Capitalism 2.0, evolving as the latest phase of Computational Capitalism. In response, an alternative horizontally organized, multi-layered socialized system of GenAI is proposed to ultimately resolve the paradox. The article utilizes Lury’s concept of problem spaces and recomposed research problems to explore transitioning to this socialized system based on constructing multiple mediating layers of the alternative technological bloc, mediated by alliances of progressive technological organic intellectuals exercising a technological organic intellect. The conclusion addresses the challenges of passive revolution effects and transitioning compounded by the phenomenon of compressed technological time.

SystemsVol. 13(11)
University College London (GB), Capital Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital Education and Society
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.