Green <scp>FinTech</scp> —Methodological Controversies in Research

ABSTRACT The vast majority of research in the area of green FinTech indicates the positive impact of the use of digital technologies in finance on the environment. However, preliminary literature studies have revealed serious doubts about the way in which these results were obtained. The paper aims to determine the methodological correctness of research on the assessment of the impact of FinTech on the natural environment. The authors identified three research streams within the field of green FinTech, with the greatest controversies found in studies employing econometric models. A critical analysis of the literature shows that most studies have chosen incorrect variables to represent the development of FinTech. The variables cover a wide area of information and communication technologies; individual financial services are used to represent the complex phenomenon of FinTech, and there is a complete lack of references to artificial intelligence, big data, cloud computing and green aspects of financial services. Furthermore, no distinction was made between the FinTech approach by subject and by object, and inappropriate definitions were used for the phenomenon analysed. The conclusions of the study are addressed to researchers and concern the need for an in‐depth understanding of the research problem, a critical approach to the results of previous research in the field of green FinTech, and the selection of appropriate variables used in models. The work concludes with recommendations for international institutions regarding the construction of a green FinTech index and provides a preliminary framework for its structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70376
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Green FinTech —Methodological Controversies in Research

Anna Piotrowska, Michał Bernard Pietrzak, Dariusz Piotrowski
Sustainable Development
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

Green FinTech —Methodological Controversies in Research

Anna Piotrowska, Michał Bernard Pietrzak, Dariusz Piotrowski
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The vast majority of research in the area of green FinTech indicates the positive impact of the use of digital technologies in finance on the environment. However, preliminary literature studies have revealed serious doubts about the way in which these results were obtained. The paper aims to determine the methodological correctness of research on the assessment of the impact of FinTech on the natural environment. The authors identified three research streams within the field of green FinTech, with the greatest controversies found in studies employing econometric models. A critical analysis of the literature shows that most studies have chosen incorrect variables to represent the development of FinTech. The variables cover a wide area of information and communication technologies; individual financial services are used to represent the complex phenomenon of FinTech, and there is a complete lack of references to artificial intelligence, big data, cloud computing and green aspects of financial services. Furthermore, no distinction was made between the FinTech approach by subject and by object, and inappropriate definitions were used for the phenomenon analysed. The conclusions of the study are addressed to researchers and concern the need for an in‐depth understanding of the research problem, a critical approach to the results of previous research in the field of green FinTech, and the selection of appropriate variables used in models. The work concludes with recommendations for international institutions regarding the construction of a green FinTech index and provides a preliminary framework for its structure.

Sustainable DevelopmentVol. 34(S2)
Gdańsk University of Technology (PL), Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL), University of Gdańsk (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Green <scp>FinTech</scp> —Methodological Controversies in Research — Anna Piotrowska, Michał Bernard Pietrzak, et al. · Sustainable Development (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS