Cultural Diplomacy’s Challenges: Rethinking Them Through Knowledge Brokering

This article examines why cultural diplomacy (CD) encounters operational, contextual, and relational challenges including resource misalignment, cultural difference, bureaucratic constraint, and limited mobility, and identifies gaps in knowledge flows across national, institutional, and organizational boundaries as a central mechanism. We develop a knowledge-brokering (KB) informed framework and apply thematic analysis to purposively sampled interviews, an exploratory questionnaire, and deliberations from an online symposium and focus-group discussions with UK cultural organizations in the post-Brexit/post-pandemic period. Findings indicate that cross-boundary brokering is patchy, knowledge is “sticky” at organizational interfaces, and evaluation practices remain ad hoc. We theorize KB as a linking function between intent, design, and implementation, operating as both a preventive and a coping mechanism. We then outline implications for coordination, learning, and accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Arts Management Law and Society
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2025.2568847
Primary Topic
International Student and Expatriate Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural Diplomacy’s Challenges: Rethinking Them Through Knowledge Brokering

Biyun Zhu, Charlotte Faucher
The Journal of Arts Management Law and Society
International Student and Expatriate Challenges
article

Cultural Diplomacy’s Challenges: Rethinking Them Through Knowledge Brokering

Biyun Zhu, Charlotte Faucher
article en

Abstract

This article examines why cultural diplomacy (CD) encounters operational, contextual, and relational challenges including resource misalignment, cultural difference, bureaucratic constraint, and limited mobility, and identifies gaps in knowledge flows across national, institutional, and organizational boundaries as a central mechanism. We develop a knowledge-brokering (KB) informed framework and apply thematic analysis to purposively sampled interviews, an exploratory questionnaire, and deliberations from an online symposium and focus-group discussions with UK cultural organizations in the post-Brexit/post-pandemic period. Findings indicate that cross-boundary brokering is patchy, knowledge is “sticky” at organizational interfaces, and evaluation practices remain ad hoc. We theorize KB as a linking function between intent, design, and implementation, operating as both a preventive and a coping mechanism. We then outline implications for coordination, learning, and accountability.

The Journal of Arts Management Law and Society
University of Manchester (GB), University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
International Student and Expatriate Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cultural Diplomacy’s Challenges: Rethinking Them Through Knowledge Brokering — Biyun Zhu, Charlotte Faucher · The Journal of Arts Management Law and Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS