Spatial self-confounding: smoothness-related estimation bias in spatial regression models

Abstract The estimation of regression parameters in spatially referenced data plays a crucial role across various scientific domains. A common approach involves employing an additive regression model to capture the relationship between observations and covariates, accounting for spatial variability not explained by the covariates through a Gaussian random field. We study the effect of misspecified covariates, in particular when the misspecification changes the smoothness. We analyse the theoretical properties of the generalized least-squares estimator under infill asymptotics, and show that the estimator can have counter-intuitive properties. In particular, the estimated regression coefficients can converge to zero as the number of observations increases if the covariates are too rough, despite high correlations between observations and covariates. This has important implications for practical applications as the importance of rough covariates can be severely underestimated, leading to incorrect scientific conclusions. We also show that the estimates can diverge to infinity under certain conditions, which can also lead to incorrect conclusions in practical applications. Through an application to temperature and precipitation data, we show that both behaviours can be observed for real data. Finally, we propose adding a smoothing step in the regression and show both theoretically and practically that this can solve the problem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biometrika
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asaf076
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial self-confounding: smoothness-related estimation bias in spatial regression models

Jonas Wallin, David Bolin
Biometrika
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
article

Spatial self-confounding: smoothness-related estimation bias in spatial regression models

Jonas Wallin, David Bolin
article en

Abstract

Abstract The estimation of regression parameters in spatially referenced data plays a crucial role across various scientific domains. A common approach involves employing an additive regression model to capture the relationship between observations and covariates, accounting for spatial variability not explained by the covariates through a Gaussian random field. We study the effect of misspecified covariates, in particular when the misspecification changes the smoothness. We analyse the theoretical properties of the generalized least-squares estimator under infill asymptotics, and show that the estimator can have counter-intuitive properties. In particular, the estimated regression coefficients can converge to zero as the number of observations increases if the covariates are too rough, despite high correlations between observations and covariates. This has important implications for practical applications as the importance of rough covariates can be severely underestimated, leading to incorrect scientific conclusions. We also show that the estimates can diverge to infinity under certain conditions, which can also lead to incorrect conclusions in practical applications. Through an application to temperature and precipitation data, we show that both behaviours can be observed for real data. Finally, we propose adding a smoothing step in the regression and show both theoretically and practically that this can solve the problem.

BiometrikaVol. 113(1)
Lund University (SE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Spatial self-confounding: smoothness-related estimation bias in spatial regression models — Jonas Wallin, David Bolin · Biometrika (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS