A method for simultaneously determining both the inhalable fraction and vapor concentration to assess worker exposure to tri- <i>n</i> -butyl phosphate

A personal sampler, the IFV Pro, equipped with a glass-fiber filter (GFF) and a Chromosorb 106 adsorption tube was used. Postsampling, TBP was extracted or desorbed separately from the GFF and Chromosorb 106 using dichloromethane containing tri-n-amyl phosphate as an internal standard. The solutions obtained were analyzed via gas chromatography with a flame ionization detector. The evaluation parameters for validating the method included extraction efficiency, desorption efficiency, retention efficiency, storage stability, method quantitation limit, and reproducibility. Results The extraction efficiency of TBP from the GFF ranged from 97% to 100%, whereas the desorption efficiency from Chromosorb 106 was between 98% and 102%. The retention efficiencies for TBP were 0% (not quantitative, <0.68 μg/sample) to 88% on the GFF, and 7% to 95% on Chromosorb 106, culminating in a total retention efficiency of 95%-98%. Relative SDs, indicative of reproducibility, ranged from 0.8% to 6.9%. Both TBP on the GFF and in the Chromosorb 106 tube maintained stability under refrigeration at 4°C for at least 7 days. The method quantitation limit was established at 6.00 μg/sample. Conclusions A method was established to measure both the inhalable fraction and vapor concentration of TBP across an air concentration range of 0.05 to 10 mg/m3. This method is potentially valuable for assessing TBP exposure levels in workers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Occupational Health
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiaf063
Primary Topic
Occupational exposure and asthma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A method for simultaneously determining both the inhalable fraction and vapor concentration to assess worker exposure to tri- n -butyl phosphate

Ginji Endo, Yoko Endo, Ai Yamada, Y. Miyama et al.
Journal of Occupational Health
Occupational exposure and asthma
article

A method for simultaneously determining both the inhalable fraction and vapor concentration to assess worker exposure to tri- n -butyl phosphate

Ginji Endo, Yoko Endo, Ai Yamada, Y. Miyama, Kenta Ishii, Akito Takeuchi, Shinobu Yamamoto, Tomiko Tashiro, M. Inoue
article en

Abstract

A personal sampler, the IFV Pro, equipped with a glass-fiber filter (GFF) and a Chromosorb 106 adsorption tube was used. Postsampling, TBP was extracted or desorbed separately from the GFF and Chromosorb 106 using dichloromethane containing tri-n-amyl phosphate as an internal standard. The solutions obtained were analyzed via gas chromatography with a flame ionization detector. The evaluation parameters for validating the method included extraction efficiency, desorption efficiency, retention efficiency, storage stability, method quantitation limit, and reproducibility. Results The extraction efficiency of TBP from the GFF ranged from 97% to 100%, whereas the desorption efficiency from Chromosorb 106 was between 98% and 102%. The retention efficiencies for TBP were 0% (not quantitative, <0.68 μg/sample) to 88% on the GFF, and 7% to 95% on Chromosorb 106, culminating in a total retention efficiency of 95%-98%. Relative SDs, indicative of reproducibility, ranged from 0.8% to 6.9%. Both TBP on the GFF and in the Chromosorb 106 tube maintained stability under refrigeration at 4°C for at least 7 days. The method quantitation limit was established at 6.00 μg/sample. Conclusions A method was established to measure both the inhalable fraction and vapor concentration of TBP across an air concentration range of 0.05 to 10 mg/m3. This method is potentially valuable for assessing TBP exposure levels in workers.

Journal of Occupational HealthVol. 67(1)
Nihon University (JP), Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association (JP), Nagoya University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Occupational exposure and asthma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.