The Cost of Carbon: Negative Stock Market Reaction to China’s Carbon Emission Trading (CET) Market

On July 16, 2021, China launched its national carbon emission trading (CET) market, with initial participation limited to firms in the power sector. This study examines the stock market’s response to this policy change. Results show that power sector firms recorded stock returns approximately 2% to 4% lower than those of other firms in the immediate aftermath of the CET market’s introduction, with the difference being statistically significant at the 1% level. The effect is particularly pronounced for firms located in regions with limited energy transition capacity. Using a difference-in-differences (DID) framework, we also find that power sector firms experienced declines in profitability and increases in operating costs, providing a plausible explanation for the observed market reaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial Economics Letters
Published
2025-06-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58567/fel04020003
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Cost of Carbon: Negative Stock Market Reaction to China’s Carbon Emission Trading (CET) Market

Mingyuan You, Xiaobo Liang
Financial Economics Letters
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

The Cost of Carbon: Negative Stock Market Reaction to China’s Carbon Emission Trading (CET) Market

Mingyuan You, Xiaobo Liang
article en

Abstract

On July 16, 2021, China launched its national carbon emission trading (CET) market, with initial participation limited to firms in the power sector. This study examines the stock market’s response to this policy change. Results show that power sector firms recorded stock returns approximately 2% to 4% lower than those of other firms in the immediate aftermath of the CET market’s introduction, with the difference being statistically significant at the 1% level. The effect is particularly pronounced for firms located in regions with limited energy transition capacity. Using a difference-in-differences (DID) framework, we also find that power sector firms experienced declines in profitability and increases in operating costs, providing a plausible explanation for the observed market reaction.

Financial Economics LettersVol. 4(2)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), Central Party School of the Communist Party of China (CN), Qingdao Party School of CPC (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.