Analysis of the AI prompt used to improve safety management system accessibility

This paper presents a timely and highly relevant investigation for evaluating the effectiveness of AI prompt engineering in improving the safety management system. The study focuses on upstream oil and gas operations, which frequently struggle with quick access to essential safety information. The study investigated an internal AI system configured to access company health, safety, and environmental documentation repositories. The performance is assessed using 30 safety-related prompts across six distinct operational domains, each evaluated on the criteria of relevance, clarity, and completeness, with scores ranging from 1 to 5. Results revealed a trimodal performance distribution, with 60% perfect scores, 30% complete failures attributed to indexing and contextual interpretation issues, and 10% moderate performance( characterized by partial correctness or some degree of inaccuracy). A particularly insightful observation was that high clarity scores were sometimes paradoxically paired with incorrect citations, suggesting that the AI could convincingly present erroneous information. From a process safety perspective, this paper discusses the significant potential of AI to mitigate human error stemming from information scarcity in critical operations. It also critically examines the inherent risks of AI-generated inaccuracies that could lead to potential events in safety-critical contexts. The study recommends the adoption of a hybrid human-AI system, rigorous technical transparency, expanded evaluation methodologies, and a robust framework for addressing ethical considerations to ensure the responsible and effective deployment of AI in hazardous environments. • Present a detailed analysis of the Artificial Intelligence Prompt for Safety Management. • The study identifies critical gaps in the effectiveness of AI prompt use for Safety Management. • The study recommends key elements to be considered in developing a responsible AI system to support Safety Management

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
Published
2025-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105834
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of the AI prompt used to improve safety management system accessibility

Faisal Irshad Khan, Nazmul H.G. Rahmani, Michael Endler
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

Analysis of the AI prompt used to improve safety management system accessibility

Faisal Irshad Khan, Nazmul H.G. Rahmani, Michael Endler
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a timely and highly relevant investigation for evaluating the effectiveness of AI prompt engineering in improving the safety management system. The study focuses on upstream oil and gas operations, which frequently struggle with quick access to essential safety information. The study investigated an internal AI system configured to access company health, safety, and environmental documentation repositories. The performance is assessed using 30 safety-related prompts across six distinct operational domains, each evaluated on the criteria of relevance, clarity, and completeness, with scores ranging from 1 to 5. Results revealed a trimodal performance distribution, with 60% perfect scores, 30% complete failures attributed to indexing and contextual interpretation issues, and 10% moderate performance( characterized by partial correctness or some degree of inaccuracy). A particularly insightful observation was that high clarity scores were sometimes paradoxically paired with incorrect citations, suggesting that the AI could convincingly present erroneous information. From a process safety perspective, this paper discusses the significant potential of AI to mitigate human error stemming from information scarcity in critical operations. It also critically examines the inherent risks of AI-generated inaccuracies that could lead to potential events in safety-critical contexts. The study recommends the adoption of a hybrid human-AI system, rigorous technical transparency, expanded evaluation methodologies, and a robust framework for addressing ethical considerations to ensure the responsible and effective deployment of AI in hazardous environments. • Present a detailed analysis of the Artificial Intelligence Prompt for Safety Management. • The study identifies critical gaps in the effectiveness of AI prompt use for Safety Management. • The study recommends key elements to be considered in developing a responsible AI system to support Safety Management

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process IndustriesVol. 99
O’Connor Hospital (US), Mary Kay (United States) (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.