The Relationship Between Workplace Learning Activities of Estheticians and Formal, Informal, and Incidental Workplace Learning and Job Performance

This study empirically analyzed the effects of workplace learning activities—specifically formal, informal, and incidental workplace learning—on job performance among estheticians aged 20 to 50. The results showed that most participants worked long hours in franchise settings and actively engaged in various types of workplace learning. Among industry-supported learning, off-site group technical training, systematic on-the-job training (S-OJT), and formal mentoring were perceived as most effective for improving job competence. For self-development, technical training, informal mentoring, and online distance education were rated highly effective. All three types of workplace learning had significant positive effects on job performance, with incidental learning showing the strongest influence, followed by informal and formal learning. This highlights the critical role of practical experience and problem-solving skills for estheticians. Ultimately, this study systematically examined estheticians’ learning experiences and empirically demonstrated their connection to actual job performance, contributing both academically and practically. However, as the data were collected from a specific region and a limited sample, the findings may not fully represent the entire beauty industry. Future research should include comparative analyses across various job areas and career levels, as well as longitudinal studies to further explore the sustainability and effectiveness of workplace learning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Korean Society of Cosmetology
Published
2025-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52660/jksc.2025.31.5.1076
Primary Topic
Higher Education and Employability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Relationship Between Workplace Learning Activities of Estheticians and Formal, Informal, and Incidental Workplace Learning and Job Performance

CheZin Lim, Jang-Young Kim
Journal of the Korean Society of Cosmetology
Higher Education and Employability
article

The Relationship Between Workplace Learning Activities of Estheticians and Formal, Informal, and Incidental Workplace Learning and Job Performance

CheZin Lim, Jang-Young Kim
article en

Abstract

This study empirically analyzed the effects of workplace learning activities—specifically formal, informal, and incidental workplace learning—on job performance among estheticians aged 20 to 50. The results showed that most participants worked long hours in franchise settings and actively engaged in various types of workplace learning. Among industry-supported learning, off-site group technical training, systematic on-the-job training (S-OJT), and formal mentoring were perceived as most effective for improving job competence. For self-development, technical training, informal mentoring, and online distance education were rated highly effective. All three types of workplace learning had significant positive effects on job performance, with incidental learning showing the strongest influence, followed by informal and formal learning. This highlights the critical role of practical experience and problem-solving skills for estheticians. Ultimately, this study systematically examined estheticians’ learning experiences and empirically demonstrated their connection to actual job performance, contributing both academically and practically. However, as the data were collected from a specific region and a limited sample, the findings may not fully represent the entire beauty industry. Future research should include comparative analyses across various job areas and career levels, as well as longitudinal studies to further explore the sustainability and effectiveness of workplace learning.

Journal of the Korean Society of CosmetologyVol. 31(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Higher Education and Employability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.