Randomized Phase III Study (ADMYRE) of Plitidepsin in Combination with Dexamethasone vs. Dexamethasone Alone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results for Patients Aged <75 Years

<i>Background:</i> The phase III ADMYRE trial evaluated plitidepsin plus dexamethasone (DXM) versus DXM alone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (r/r MM). ADMYRE met its primary endpoint, showing a 35% reduction in the risk of progression or death. <i>Methods:</i> Results from a pre-planned subgroup of patients aged <75 years are shown here. This subgroup includes most of the patients evaluated in the ADMYRE study: 145/171 patients (84.8%) in the plitidepsin + DXM arm and 71/84 (84.5%) patients in the DXM alone arm. <i>Results:</i> Compared to the overall ADMYRE population, a higher reduction was found with plitidepsin plus DXM for the risk of progression or death in the primary endpoint: 47.7% vs. 35.0% (Hazard ratio [HR] = 0.523 vs. HR = 0.6509). Higher reduction in the risk of death was also found (28.9% vs. 20.3%; HR = 0.711 vs. HR = 0.797), with a clinically meaningful 5-month difference in median overall survival (13.0 months vs. 8.1 months; <i>p</i> = 0.0350). The safety profile of plitidepsin plus DXM in patients aged <75 years was similar to that observed in the overall population of patients treated in the ADMYRE study. The most common adverse events (all grades) related to the study treatment in patients < 75 years were fatigue (39.2% of patients), gastrointestinal (nausea, 39.2%; vomiting, 19.6%; diarrhea, 14.7%), and myalgia (14.0%). <i>Conclusions:</i> Larger differences in efficacy outcomes while maintaining a similar safety profile, together with a novel mechanism of action, suggest that this combination can be a valid option for patients with r/r MM aged <75 years.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17213482
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Randomized Phase III Study (ADMYRE) of Plitidepsin in Combination with Dexamethasone vs. Dexamethasone Alone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results for Patients Aged <75 Years

María‐Victoria Mateos, H Ludwig, Evangelos Terpos, Vicente Alfaro et al.
Cancers
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

Randomized Phase III Study (ADMYRE) of Plitidepsin in Combination with Dexamethasone vs. Dexamethasone Alone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results for Patients Aged <75 Years

María‐Victoria Mateos, H Ludwig, Evangelos Terpos, Vicente Alfaro, Carmen Kahatt, Javier León Jiménez, Javier Gómez, Sara Martínez, Sonia Extremera
article en

Abstract

<i>Background:</i> The phase III ADMYRE trial evaluated plitidepsin plus dexamethasone (DXM) versus DXM alone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (r/r MM). ADMYRE met its primary endpoint, showing a 35% reduction in the risk of progression or death. <i>Methods:</i> Results from a pre-planned subgroup of patients aged <75 years are shown here. This subgroup includes most of the patients evaluated in the ADMYRE study: 145/171 patients (84.8%) in the plitidepsin + DXM arm and 71/84 (84.5%) patients in the DXM alone arm. <i>Results:</i> Compared to the overall ADMYRE population, a higher reduction was found with plitidepsin plus DXM for the risk of progression or death in the primary endpoint: 47.7% vs. 35.0% (Hazard ratio [HR] = 0.523 vs. HR = 0.6509). Higher reduction in the risk of death was also found (28.9% vs. 20.3%; HR = 0.711 vs. HR = 0.797), with a clinically meaningful 5-month difference in median overall survival (13.0 months vs. 8.1 months; <i>p</i> = 0.0350). The safety profile of plitidepsin plus DXM in patients aged <75 years was similar to that observed in the overall population of patients treated in the ADMYRE study. The most common adverse events (all grades) related to the study treatment in patients < 75 years were fatigue (39.2% of patients), gastrointestinal (nausea, 39.2%; vomiting, 19.6%; diarrhea, 14.7%), and myalgia (14.0%). <i>Conclusions:</i> Larger differences in efficacy outcomes while maintaining a similar safety profile, together with a novel mechanism of action, suggest that this combination can be a valid option for patients with r/r MM aged <75 years.

CancersVol. 17(21)
Universidad de Salamanca (ES), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Wilhelminen Hospital (AT), PharmaMar (Spain) (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.