Machine Learning Models for Groundwater Level Prediction and Uncertainty Analysis in Ruataniwha Basin, New Zealand

Groundwater level predictive monitoring is necessary to address accelerated aquifer depletion and ensure sustainable management under increasing climatic and anthropogenic pressures. This study uses machine learning approaches to model groundwater level (GWL) dynamics in six observation wells in the Ruataniwha Basin, New Zealand. These models are enhanced with seasonal decomposition techniques. This study uses both static properties and dynamic variables to capture hydrogeological heterogeneity. Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM), with seasonal decomposition preprocessing, were developed for GWL modelling. The models were trained on 80% of the dataset and tested using the remaining 20% of the data. Model accuracy was assessed using five statistical metrics: mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), the coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute percent error (MAPE), and percent bias (PBIAS). Model uncertainty was analyzed using Bayesian Model Averaging combined with the p-factor and d-factor at the 95% confidence level. The results demonstrate that both models delivered strong predictive performance across training, testing, and full period evaluations. However, the RF model demonstrated a marginally superior predictive accuracy by achieving lower errors (MAE: 0.013–0.174; RMSE: 0.04–0.283), better bias control (PBIAS ≈ 0%), and slightly tighter error bounds in most wells. Uncertainty quantification revealed that models provided a minimum p-factor of 0.878, capturing more than 87% of the observed GWL data within the uncertainty bounds. Comparing the results of both models, the RF model has higher p-factor values ranging from 0.878 to 0.976 with precise interval widths (d-factor: 0.436–0.769), indicating its reliability for adaptive groundwater management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrology
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology12110282
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning Models for Groundwater Level Prediction and Uncertainty Analysis in Ruataniwha Basin, New Zealand

Mohammed Benaafi, Husam Musa Baalousha, Dawit Kanito
Hydrology
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
article

Machine Learning Models for Groundwater Level Prediction and Uncertainty Analysis in Ruataniwha Basin, New Zealand

Mohammed Benaafi, Husam Musa Baalousha, Dawit Kanito
article en

Abstract

Groundwater level predictive monitoring is necessary to address accelerated aquifer depletion and ensure sustainable management under increasing climatic and anthropogenic pressures. This study uses machine learning approaches to model groundwater level (GWL) dynamics in six observation wells in the Ruataniwha Basin, New Zealand. These models are enhanced with seasonal decomposition techniques. This study uses both static properties and dynamic variables to capture hydrogeological heterogeneity. Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM), with seasonal decomposition preprocessing, were developed for GWL modelling. The models were trained on 80% of the dataset and tested using the remaining 20% of the data. Model accuracy was assessed using five statistical metrics: mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), the coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute percent error (MAPE), and percent bias (PBIAS). Model uncertainty was analyzed using Bayesian Model Averaging combined with the p-factor and d-factor at the 95% confidence level. The results demonstrate that both models delivered strong predictive performance across training, testing, and full period evaluations. However, the RF model demonstrated a marginally superior predictive accuracy by achieving lower errors (MAE: 0.013–0.174; RMSE: 0.04–0.283), better bias control (PBIAS ≈ 0%), and slightly tighter error bounds in most wells. Uncertainty quantification revealed that models provided a minimum p-factor of 0.878, capturing more than 87% of the observed GWL data within the uncertainty bounds. Comparing the results of both models, the RF model has higher p-factor values ranging from 0.878 to 0.976 with precise interval widths (d-factor: 0.436–0.769), indicating its reliability for adaptive groundwater management.

HydrologyVol. 12(11)
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.