Enhancing Transparency and Replicability in Data Collection: Lessons from the Construction of Three Education Datasets

Assembling datasets is crucial for advancing social science research, but researchers who construct datasets often face difficult decisions with little guidance. Once public, these datasets are sometimes used without proper consideration of their creators’ choices and how these affect the validity of inferences. To support both data creators and data users, we discuss the strengths, limitations, and implications of various data collection methodologies and strategies, showing how seemingly trivial methodological differences can significantly impact conclusions. The lessons we distill build on the process of constructing three cross-national datasets on education systems. Despite their common focus, these datasets differ in the dimensions they measure, as well as their definitions of key concepts, coding thresholds and other assumptions, types of coders, and sources. From these lessons, we develop and propose general guidelines for dataset creators and users aimed at enhancing transparency, replicability, and valid inferences in the social sciences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives on Politics
Published
2025-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592725103058
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Improvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Transparency and Replicability in Data Collection: Lessons from the Construction of Three Education Datasets

Agustina Paglayan, Adrián del Río, Eugenia Nazrullaeva, Carl Henrik Knutsen et al.
Perspectives on Politics
Educational Assessment and Improvement
article

Enhancing Transparency and Replicability in Data Collection: Lessons from the Construction of Three Education Datasets

Agustina Paglayan, Adrián del Río, Eugenia Nazrullaeva, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Wooseok Kim, Anja Neundorf
article en

Abstract

Assembling datasets is crucial for advancing social science research, but researchers who construct datasets often face difficult decisions with little guidance. Once public, these datasets are sometimes used without proper consideration of their creators’ choices and how these affect the validity of inferences. To support both data creators and data users, we discuss the strengths, limitations, and implications of various data collection methodologies and strategies, showing how seemingly trivial methodological differences can significantly impact conclusions. The lessons we distill build on the process of constructing three cross-national datasets on education systems. Despite their common focus, these datasets differ in the dimensions they measure, as well as their definitions of key concepts, coding thresholds and other assumptions, types of coders, and sources. From these lessons, we develop and propose general guidelines for dataset creators and users aimed at enhancing transparency, replicability, and valid inferences in the social sciences.

Perspectives on Politics
Peace Research Institute Oslo (NO)
Universitetet i Oslo
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Educational Assessment and Improvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhancing Transparency and Replicability in Data Collection: Lessons from the Construction of Three Education Datasets — Agustina Paglayan, Adrián del Río, et al. · Perspectives on Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS