Discussing Sexual Health During Diabetes Care, a Survey of UK Women—My Diabetes Nurse “Would Fall off Her Chair If I Mentioned It”

<b>Aims</b>: To ask UK women with diabetes whether they have discussed sexual health with healthcare professionals (HCPs) during diabetes care, and to explore communication barriers. <b>Methods</b>: An online questionnaire was developed, based on a published HCP communication survey, piloted by six women with diabetes. A total of 163 participants, recruited via social media and HCP network, completed Part 1 by selecting Likert or narrative response options, providing descriptive data. We report proportions with 95% confidence intervals (Wilson); percentages are calculated using the number responding to each item. Item-level missingness is retained as a non-analysed category, and the n is reported per question. No inferential comparisons were planned a priori. After Part 1 completion, participants could choose to finish, or to continue to Part 2 questions regarding vulval anatomy, function, and vocabulary (77 completed 2A: 80 completed 2B). Part 2 data was analysed thematically. <b>Results</b>: During diabetes care, a minority of participants, 44/163 (27%), said they had ever discussed sexual health, or had been advised how to access sexual health support, 28/163 (17%). If an HCP discussed sexual health, many women said they expected to feel surprised, 114/163 (70%), or pleased, 88/163 (54%). Some participants said they expected HCPs would find the topic inappropriate, 56/163 (36%), or annoying, 44/163 (27%). Some participants expressed HCP gender preference (75/163 [46%] female and 4/163 [3%] male) for such discussion. Part 2 findings revealed unmet sexual health literacy needs with potential to impact on communication with HCPs. <b>Conclusions</b>: Women reported infrequent communication about sexual health and diabetes during diabetes care. Findings highlight potential communication barriers for some participants including the following: unmet educational needs regarding diabetes and sexual health, lack of confidence about available support, fear of a negative HCP response, and preference for the gender of the HCP. Whereas in previous research, HCPs feared upsetting women by discussing sexual health, many participants said they expected to respond positively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13212743
Primary Topic
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discussing Sexual Health During Diabetes Care, a Survey of UK Women—My Diabetes Nurse “Would Fall off Her Chair If I Mentioned It”

David Andrew Griffiths, Joanna Clare Murphy, Kirsty Winkley, Debbie Cooke et al.
Healthcare
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
article

Discussing Sexual Health During Diabetes Care, a Survey of UK Women—My Diabetes Nurse “Would Fall off Her Chair If I Mentioned It”

David Andrew Griffiths, Joanna Clare Murphy, Kirsty Winkley, Debbie Cooke, Emily Setty
article en

Abstract

<b>Aims</b>: To ask UK women with diabetes whether they have discussed sexual health with healthcare professionals (HCPs) during diabetes care, and to explore communication barriers. <b>Methods</b>: An online questionnaire was developed, based on a published HCP communication survey, piloted by six women with diabetes. A total of 163 participants, recruited via social media and HCP network, completed Part 1 by selecting Likert or narrative response options, providing descriptive data. We report proportions with 95% confidence intervals (Wilson); percentages are calculated using the number responding to each item. Item-level missingness is retained as a non-analysed category, and the n is reported per question. No inferential comparisons were planned a priori. After Part 1 completion, participants could choose to finish, or to continue to Part 2 questions regarding vulval anatomy, function, and vocabulary (77 completed 2A: 80 completed 2B). Part 2 data was analysed thematically. <b>Results</b>: During diabetes care, a minority of participants, 44/163 (27%), said they had ever discussed sexual health, or had been advised how to access sexual health support, 28/163 (17%). If an HCP discussed sexual health, many women said they expected to feel surprised, 114/163 (70%), or pleased, 88/163 (54%). Some participants said they expected HCPs would find the topic inappropriate, 56/163 (36%), or annoying, 44/163 (27%). Some participants expressed HCP gender preference (75/163 [46%] female and 4/163 [3%] male) for such discussion. Part 2 findings revealed unmet sexual health literacy needs with potential to impact on communication with HCPs. <b>Conclusions</b>: Women reported infrequent communication about sexual health and diabetes during diabetes care. Findings highlight potential communication barriers for some participants including the following: unmet educational needs regarding diabetes and sexual health, lack of confidence about available support, fear of a negative HCP response, and preference for the gender of the HCP. Whereas in previous research, HCPs feared upsetting women by discussing sexual health, many participants said they expected to respond positively.

HealthcareVol. 13(21)
King's College - North Carolina (US), King's College London (GB), University of Surrey (GB), Atlantis Resources (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.