Evaluating Various Energy Balance Aggregation Schemes in Cotton Using Unoccupied Aerial Systems (UASs)-Based Latent Heat Flux Estimates

Daily evapotranspiration (ET) estimated from an unoccupied aerial system (UAS) could help improve irrigation practices, but its spatial resolution needs to be upscaled to coarser pixel resolutions before applying surface energy balance models. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of various energy balance-based aggregation schemes on generating spatially distributed latent heat flux (LE), and, in comparison, to existing occupied aircraft and satellite remote sensing platforms. In 2017, UAS multispectral and thermal imagery, along with ground truth data, were collected at various cotton growth stages. These data sources were combined to model LE using a Two-Source Energy Balance Priestley–Taylor (TSEB-PT) model. Several UAS aggregation schemes were tested, including the mode of aggregation (i.e., input image and output flux) as well as the averaging scheme (i.e., simple aggregation vs. Box–Cox). Results indicate that output flux aggregation with Box–Cox averaging produced the lowest relative upscaling pixel-scale variability in LE and the lowest absolute prediction errors (relative to eddy covariance flux tower measurements). Output flux aggregation with simple averaging was also more accurate in reproducing LE from occupied aircraft and satellite imagery. Although results are limited to a single site, UAS LE estimates were reliably aggregated to coarser pixel resolutions, which made for faster image processing for operational applications.