What is a “good” website for communicating biosecurity information to farmers and veterinarians?

Although many websites provide biosecurity information, there is no structured guidance on what constitutes an effective biosecurity website. This study aimed to understand what is a good biosecurity website for farmers and veterinarians, and to what extent different websites meet the proposed good features. The study included three steps: i) A World Café activity was conducted to identify the features of a "good" biosecurity website. ii) A sample of biosecurity websites was identified through an online survey and generative artificial intelligence and then screened by researchers. iii) The main improvement needs of biosecurity websites were detected by comparing the screened websites with the features of a "good" biosecurity website. Based on the World Café, the features of a good biosecurity website targeted to farmers were ease of use, cost-free access, availability in local languages and content including, for example, biosecurity lessons with media, examples of farm practices, biosecurity guidelines, self-evaluation tests of person's knowledge and farm's biosecurity level, and news about disease outbreaks and regulations. A good website for veterinarians should contain more detailed protocols, guidelines and tools than a website for farmers, and resources for creating biosecurity plans and enhancing veterinarian-farmer communication. The depth and breadth of information available on the screened websites varied. Most websites had a limited number of "good" features present. The comparison step suggested that the greatest improvement potential among the websites was in adding information on how to communicate about biosecurity, biosecurity's costs and benefits, self-evaluation tests, and videos and illustrations about biosecurity measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Veterinary Science
Published
2025-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105938
Primary Topic
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is a “good” website for communicating biosecurity information to farmers and veterinarians?

Marco De Nardi, Ina Toppari, Jarkko K. Niemi, Claude Saegerman et al.
Research in Veterinary Science
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
article

What is a “good” website for communicating biosecurity information to farmers and veterinarians?

Marco De Nardi, Ina Toppari, Jarkko K. Niemi, Claude Saegerman, Rreze M. Gecaj, Ramazan Yıldız, Tarmo Niine, Constance Wielick, Maria‐Eleni Filippitzi, Blerta Mehmedi, Anna Maria Iatrou, Alberto Oscar Allepuz Palau, Georgios Batikas
article en

Abstract

Although many websites provide biosecurity information, there is no structured guidance on what constitutes an effective biosecurity website. This study aimed to understand what is a good biosecurity website for farmers and veterinarians, and to what extent different websites meet the proposed good features. The study included three steps: i) A World Café activity was conducted to identify the features of a "good" biosecurity website. ii) A sample of biosecurity websites was identified through an online survey and generative artificial intelligence and then screened by researchers. iii) The main improvement needs of biosecurity websites were detected by comparing the screened websites with the features of a "good" biosecurity website. Based on the World Café, the features of a good biosecurity website targeted to farmers were ease of use, cost-free access, availability in local languages and content including, for example, biosecurity lessons with media, examples of farm practices, biosecurity guidelines, self-evaluation tests of person's knowledge and farm's biosecurity level, and news about disease outbreaks and regulations. A good website for veterinarians should contain more detailed protocols, guidelines and tools than a website for farmers, and resources for creating biosecurity plans and enhancing veterinarian-farmer communication. The depth and breadth of information available on the screened websites varied. Most websites had a limited number of "good" features present. The comparison step suggested that the greatest improvement potential among the websites was in adding information on how to communicate about biosecurity, biosecurity's costs and benefits, self-evaluation tests, and videos and illustrations about biosecurity measures.

Research in Veterinary ScienceVol. 197
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), University of Liège (BE), Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences (FI), Estonian University of Life Sciences (EE), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI), University Clinical Center of Kosovo (XK), Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi (TR), University of Tartu (EE), University of Prishtina (XK), University of Western Macedonia (GR), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.