Institutional learning for safer and greener transitions: Embedding legal and process safety knowledge in China’s energy training systems

Process Safety Management (PSM) is a structured framework designed to prevent major industrial accidents by integrating technical, managerial, and behavioral controls across the plant lifecycle. In China’s energy transition, embedding PSM knowledge into workforce training has become increasingly critical. This study investigates how legal safety mandates and PSM elements are integrated into vocational education and enterprise training systems in China’s transitioning energy sector. Using an embedded case study design, we analyse qualitative data from 25 semi-structured interviews, curriculum documents, and internal HSE manuals across two representative enterprises: Jiangsu Oilfield (fossil energy) and a CNOOC clean energy base (emerging low-carbon sector). Findings reveal four major institutional learning failures: uneven integration of PSM elements across educational and workplace training layers; misalignment between regulatory expectations and training content; fragmented coordination among schools, regulators, and companies; and stratified access to safety knowledge, particularly for outsourced workers. To address these issues, we propose the Process Safety Institutional Learning Framework (PSILF), which reconceptualizes safety education as an institutional learning infrastructure that links legal mandates, engineering practice, and workforce experience. The framework highlights critical “loss points” along the knowledge transmission pathway and suggests how education and training can act as a knowledge broker. This study contributes to process safety scholarship by advancing PSILF as a theoretical model, and offers practical recommendations for curriculum reform, inclusive enterprise training, and regulatory–educational coordination. These insights support the development of safer, greener, and more equitable industrial transitions, with relevance for other emerging economies pursuing sustainable development goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Published
2025-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2025.108054
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional learning for safer and greener transitions: Embedding legal and process safety knowledge in China’s energy training systems

Haoran Wei, Sienna Yun Chen, Tianxiang Zheng, Qiong Yuan et al.
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Institutional learning for safer and greener transitions: Embedding legal and process safety knowledge in China’s energy training systems

Haoran Wei, Sienna Yun Chen, Tianxiang Zheng, Qiong Yuan, Yuxin Jiang, Jing Su
article en

Abstract

Process Safety Management (PSM) is a structured framework designed to prevent major industrial accidents by integrating technical, managerial, and behavioral controls across the plant lifecycle. In China’s energy transition, embedding PSM knowledge into workforce training has become increasingly critical. This study investigates how legal safety mandates and PSM elements are integrated into vocational education and enterprise training systems in China’s transitioning energy sector. Using an embedded case study design, we analyse qualitative data from 25 semi-structured interviews, curriculum documents, and internal HSE manuals across two representative enterprises: Jiangsu Oilfield (fossil energy) and a CNOOC clean energy base (emerging low-carbon sector). Findings reveal four major institutional learning failures: uneven integration of PSM elements across educational and workplace training layers; misalignment between regulatory expectations and training content; fragmented coordination among schools, regulators, and companies; and stratified access to safety knowledge, particularly for outsourced workers. To address these issues, we propose the Process Safety Institutional Learning Framework (PSILF), which reconceptualizes safety education as an institutional learning infrastructure that links legal mandates, engineering practice, and workforce experience. The framework highlights critical “loss points” along the knowledge transmission pathway and suggests how education and training can act as a knowledge broker. This study contributes to process safety scholarship by advancing PSILF as a theoretical model, and offers practical recommendations for curriculum reform, inclusive enterprise training, and regulatory–educational coordination. These insights support the development of safer, greener, and more equitable industrial transitions, with relevance for other emerging economies pursuing sustainable development goals.

Process Safety and Environmental ProtectionVol. 204
China National Offshore Oil Corporation (China) (CN), University of Malaya (MY), Middlesex University London (GB), University of Reading (GB), Yangzhou University (CN), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.