Comparative analysis of manual and digital approaches for extracting geological hiatuses. A case study from China

Dynamic topography is a crucial geodynamic observable that emerges as a consequence of flow in the mantle. Buoyancies associated with mantle convection induce vertical deflections at the Earth’s surface. Negative surface deflections create depositional environments and allow sedimentation to occur, while positive surface deflections create erosional/non-depositional environments, that induce gaps (hiatuses) in the geological record. The temporal and spatial extent of these gaps can be mapped using geological maps and regional studies, thus providing a means of tracking mantle processes through geological time. Here, we compare a manual and digital extraction of hiatus distributions in China. We utilise a manually compiled dataset of un/conformable contacts from a previous publication and compare it to a digital contact extraction using the recently published digital geological map of China. The digital approach is limited to surface data, whereas the manual approach allows the utilisation of subsurface information. We find that the digital approach is substantially faster than the manual extraction. Our results indicate that the optimal methodology combines digital processing with refinement of manual subsurface information. Furthermore, we observe that mapping the absence and presence of a geological series shows very similar results when processed using either approach. The current limitation to a wider application of this approach is the limited availability of digital geological maps. A standardised digital database of geological maps enhanced with subsurface information (i.e., covered geological maps) is necessary to promote the use of geological data within the wider Earth science community, and would increase the opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration. • The digital approach is more time-efficient than the manual approach. • Subsurface information adds more conformable points & covers main sedimentary basins. • The optimal methodology is a digital processing, complemented by manual enhancement. • Digital availability of standardised vector geological maps increases collaborations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Structural Geology
Published
2025-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2025.105565
Primary Topic
Geological Modeling and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of manual and digital approaches for extracting geological hiatuses. A case study from China

Sara Carena, Gabriel Robl, Jincheng Ma, Berta Vilacı́s et al.
Journal of Structural Geology
Geological Modeling and Analysis
article

Comparative analysis of manual and digital approaches for extracting geological hiatuses. A case study from China

Sara Carena, Gabriel Robl, Jincheng Ma, Berta Vilacı́s, Hans‐Peter Bunge, Jorge N. Hayek
article en

Abstract

Dynamic topography is a crucial geodynamic observable that emerges as a consequence of flow in the mantle. Buoyancies associated with mantle convection induce vertical deflections at the Earth’s surface. Negative surface deflections create depositional environments and allow sedimentation to occur, while positive surface deflections create erosional/non-depositional environments, that induce gaps (hiatuses) in the geological record. The temporal and spatial extent of these gaps can be mapped using geological maps and regional studies, thus providing a means of tracking mantle processes through geological time. Here, we compare a manual and digital extraction of hiatus distributions in China. We utilise a manually compiled dataset of un/conformable contacts from a previous publication and compare it to a digital contact extraction using the recently published digital geological map of China. The digital approach is limited to surface data, whereas the manual approach allows the utilisation of subsurface information. We find that the digital approach is substantially faster than the manual extraction. Our results indicate that the optimal methodology combines digital processing with refinement of manual subsurface information. Furthermore, we observe that mapping the absence and presence of a geological series shows very similar results when processed using either approach. The current limitation to a wider application of this approach is the limited availability of digital geological maps. A standardised digital database of geological maps enhanced with subsurface information (i.e., covered geological maps) is necessary to promote the use of geological data within the wider Earth science community, and would increase the opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration. • The digital approach is more time-efficient than the manual approach. • Subsurface information adds more conformable points & covers main sedimentary basins. • The optimal methodology is a digital processing, complemented by manual enhancement. • Digital availability of standardised vector geological maps increases collaborations.

Journal of Structural GeologyVol. 202
Peking University (CN), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Geological Modeling and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.