The impact of currency market shocks on global bond fund returns and volatility

This study employs advanced econometric models—TVP-SV-VAR, BEKK-MGARCH, DCC)-MGARCH, and WQR models—to analyse the exchange rate sensitivity of global bond ETFs. It examines four major funds (BNDX, TPINX, MGBIX, and FGBFX) with differing exposures to Samurai, Yankee, and Bulldog bonds. The results show that exchange rate shocks (YEN/USD, GBP/USD, and BTC/USD) unevenly affect ETF returns and volatility across funds and time horizons. Bitcoin-related spillovers are strongest for MGBIX and FGBFX, which are more exposed to riskier emerging market bonds. TPINX and FGBFX offer limited Bitcoin volatility hedging. While conditional hedging exists, global bond ETFs primarily serve as diversifiers rather than as consistent hedges. WQR reveals fund-specific behaviour, such as BNDX hedging GBP/USD and TPINX acting as a temporary safe haven for YEN/USD during stress. Overall, hedging effectiveness varies by fund, bond exposure, and macrofinancial conditions; however, diversification plays a dominant role.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Borsa Istanbul Review
Published
2025-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2025.10.025
Primary Topic
Risk Management in Financial Firms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of currency market shocks on global bond fund returns and volatility

Zhi Wei Lu, Seong‐Min Yoon, Rim El Khoury, Oğuzhan Özçelebi et al.
Borsa Istanbul Review
Risk Management in Financial Firms
article

The impact of currency market shocks on global bond fund returns and volatility

Zhi Wei Lu, Seong‐Min Yoon, Rim El Khoury, Oğuzhan Özçelebi, Zhuhua Jiang
article en

Abstract

This study employs advanced econometric models—TVP-SV-VAR, BEKK-MGARCH, DCC)-MGARCH, and WQR models—to analyse the exchange rate sensitivity of global bond ETFs. It examines four major funds (BNDX, TPINX, MGBIX, and FGBFX) with differing exposures to Samurai, Yankee, and Bulldog bonds. The results show that exchange rate shocks (YEN/USD, GBP/USD, and BTC/USD) unevenly affect ETF returns and volatility across funds and time horizons. Bitcoin-related spillovers are strongest for MGBIX and FGBFX, which are more exposed to riskier emerging market bonds. TPINX and FGBFX offer limited Bitcoin volatility hedging. While conditional hedging exists, global bond ETFs primarily serve as diversifiers rather than as consistent hedges. WQR reveals fund-specific behaviour, such as BNDX hedging GBP/USD and TPINX acting as a temporary safe haven for YEN/USD during stress. Overall, hedging effectiveness varies by fund, bond exposure, and macrofinancial conditions; however, diversification plays a dominant role.

Borsa Istanbul ReviewVol. 26(1)
Pusan National University (KR), Lebanese American University (LB), Istanbul University (TR), Hankuk University of Foreign Studies (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Risk Management in Financial Firms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.