Optimizing agroecological transitions: A hybrid MCDM approach to conceptualizing sustainable food and nutrition systems

Food and Nutrition Systems (FNSs) face urgent challenges in achieving sustainability under the 2030 Agenda, particularly due to climate change and agroecosystem fragility. This study develops a comprehensive conceptual model of FNS grounded in agroecological principles and optimized through a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making approach combining Fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL techniques. The model integrates three interlinked subsystems— producer, consumer, and nutrition— within five sustainability dimensions (economic, environmental, social, cultural, and political). From an initial 110 sustainability indicators, 77 were refined and analyzed for influence and dependence, identifying key causal and effect indicators across three Agroecological Operational Principles (AOPs). Under AOP I (Resource Efficiency), C6 (increased use of renewable resources) emerged as the most influential indicator (Net influence (Rj-Ci) = 2.74; Total interaction (Rj + Ci) = 4.13). In AOP II (Resilience), C10 (species diversity) exhibited the highest influence (Rj-Ci = 12.93; Rj + Ci = 38.45), while C7 (organic matter and biological activity management) and C25 (dietary shifts and reduction of food loss and waste) showed notable leverage, with Rj + Ci exceeding 44 and Rj-Ci scores of 11.04 and 8.30, respectively. For AOP III (Social Equity), C57 (agroecological production practices) and C60 (localized food trade) demonstrated strong causal influence (Rj-Ci = 21.35 and 20.46, respectively). By revealing systemic interdependencies and leverage points among agroecological indicators, the model contributes both theoretically and practically, bridging disciplinary knowledge and policy domains. The optimized framework provides a strategic tool for integrated planning, governance, and decision support, enabling policymakers and practitioners to foster sustainable, resilient, and socially inclusive FNSs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Published
2025-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.101007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing agroecological transitions: A hybrid MCDM approach to conceptualizing sustainable food and nutrition systems

Saeed Mahmoudi, Abdolmajid Mahdavi Damghani, Jafar Kambouzia, Hossein Mahmoudi
1 citations
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
article

Optimizing agroecological transitions: A hybrid MCDM approach to conceptualizing sustainable food and nutrition systems

Saeed Mahmoudi, Abdolmajid Mahdavi Damghani, Jafar Kambouzia, Hossein Mahmoudi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Food and Nutrition Systems (FNSs) face urgent challenges in achieving sustainability under the 2030 Agenda, particularly due to climate change and agroecosystem fragility. This study develops a comprehensive conceptual model of FNS grounded in agroecological principles and optimized through a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making approach combining Fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL techniques. The model integrates three interlinked subsystems— producer, consumer, and nutrition— within five sustainability dimensions (economic, environmental, social, cultural, and political). From an initial 110 sustainability indicators, 77 were refined and analyzed for influence and dependence, identifying key causal and effect indicators across three Agroecological Operational Principles (AOPs). Under AOP I (Resource Efficiency), C6 (increased use of renewable resources) emerged as the most influential indicator (Net influence (Rj-Ci) = 2.74; Total interaction (Rj + Ci) = 4.13). In AOP II (Resilience), C10 (species diversity) exhibited the highest influence (Rj-Ci = 12.93; Rj + Ci = 38.45), while C7 (organic matter and biological activity management) and C25 (dietary shifts and reduction of food loss and waste) showed notable leverage, with Rj + Ci exceeding 44 and Rj-Ci scores of 11.04 and 8.30, respectively. For AOP III (Social Equity), C57 (agroecological production practices) and C60 (localized food trade) demonstrated strong causal influence (Rj-Ci = 21.35 and 20.46, respectively). By revealing systemic interdependencies and leverage points among agroecological indicators, the model contributes both theoretically and practically, bridging disciplinary knowledge and policy domains. The optimized framework provides a strategic tool for integrated planning, governance, and decision support, enabling policymakers and practitioners to foster sustainable, resilient, and socially inclusive FNSs.

Environmental and Sustainability IndicatorsVol. 28
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimizing agroecological transitions: A hybrid MCDM approach to conceptualizing sustainable food and nutrition systems — Saeed Mahmoudi, Abdolmajid Mahdavi Damghani, et al. · Environmental and Sustainability Indicators (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS