Sorbent-less dried blood spot microsampling

• A comprehensive study on sorbent-borne contamination of DBS samples was presented • Various cations and anions were identified as contaminants in all commercial sorbents • A simple procedure was proposed for quantitative DBS sampling without porous sorbents • Exact blood volume, no contamination, and improved DBS stability were achieved • The sorbent-less DBS sampling might thus be a useful concept for (trace) DBS analysis Dried blood spots (DBSs) are typically sampled on porous sorbents, which may retain analytes in their structure during DBS rehydration but also release various species into the eluates and contaminate them. To eliminate the eluate contamination, a novel concept for sorbent-less DBS microsampling was suggested, and a comprehensive study was carried out investigating the effect of the novel and the standard DBS sampling procedures on the contamination. In the novel concept, a small drop of capillary blood with a known volume was quantitatively pipetted into a non-porous polypropylene vial (compatible with capillary electrophoresis (CE) instruments for subsequent analysis) without being absorbed by any sorbent. All procedures, including DBS sampling, drying, rehydration, and homogenization, were done directly in-vial, and the blood drying time was < 3 hours. By neglecting the porous sorbent, contamination of the resulting DBS eluates by sorbent-borne species was eliminated, which was demonstrated by the CE determination of inorganic cations/anions and organic anions. The ionic composition of the rehydrated sorbent-less DBSs showed no statistical difference from the original liquid capillary blood. On the contrary, all commercial sorbents released considerable levels of ions into the eluates (Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , Na + and Cl - , NO 3 - , SO 4 2- , HCOO - being the major cationic and anionic contaminants, respectively), resulting in up to 3.5-fold higher concentrations in standard vs. sorbent-less DBS samples and having a detrimental effect on quantitative DBS analyses. Moreover, additional ionic contamination was observed for DBSs sampled on pre-impregnated sorbents and/or by volumetric devices treated with anticoagulants. Consequently, a simple, precise, and accurate procedure was presented for sorbent-less DBS microsampling in medical as well as patient-centric conditions. The most convenient and economical DBS sampling was achieved by a low-cost micropipette with adjustable volume, resulting in precision and accuracy of ≤ 1.7 and 1.4%, respectively, for quantitative blood transfers, and CE analyses repeatability of ≤ 7.2%, after the whole DBS processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Sample Preparation
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sampre.2025.100221
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sorbent-less dried blood spot microsampling

Pavel Kubáň, Miloš Dvořák, Sylvie Profousová
Advances in Sample Preparation
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
article

Sorbent-less dried blood spot microsampling

Pavel Kubáň, Miloš Dvořák, Sylvie Profousová
article en

Abstract

• A comprehensive study on sorbent-borne contamination of DBS samples was presented • Various cations and anions were identified as contaminants in all commercial sorbents • A simple procedure was proposed for quantitative DBS sampling without porous sorbents • Exact blood volume, no contamination, and improved DBS stability were achieved • The sorbent-less DBS sampling might thus be a useful concept for (trace) DBS analysis Dried blood spots (DBSs) are typically sampled on porous sorbents, which may retain analytes in their structure during DBS rehydration but also release various species into the eluates and contaminate them. To eliminate the eluate contamination, a novel concept for sorbent-less DBS microsampling was suggested, and a comprehensive study was carried out investigating the effect of the novel and the standard DBS sampling procedures on the contamination. In the novel concept, a small drop of capillary blood with a known volume was quantitatively pipetted into a non-porous polypropylene vial (compatible with capillary electrophoresis (CE) instruments for subsequent analysis) without being absorbed by any sorbent. All procedures, including DBS sampling, drying, rehydration, and homogenization, were done directly in-vial, and the blood drying time was < 3 hours. By neglecting the porous sorbent, contamination of the resulting DBS eluates by sorbent-borne species was eliminated, which was demonstrated by the CE determination of inorganic cations/anions and organic anions. The ionic composition of the rehydrated sorbent-less DBSs showed no statistical difference from the original liquid capillary blood. On the contrary, all commercial sorbents released considerable levels of ions into the eluates (Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , Na + and Cl - , NO 3 - , SO 4 2- , HCOO - being the major cationic and anionic contaminants, respectively), resulting in up to 3.5-fold higher concentrations in standard vs. sorbent-less DBS samples and having a detrimental effect on quantitative DBS analyses. Moreover, additional ionic contamination was observed for DBSs sampled on pre-impregnated sorbents and/or by volumetric devices treated with anticoagulants. Consequently, a simple, precise, and accurate procedure was presented for sorbent-less DBS microsampling in medical as well as patient-centric conditions. The most convenient and economical DBS sampling was achieved by a low-cost micropipette with adjustable volume, resulting in precision and accuracy of ≤ 1.7 and 1.4%, respectively, for quantitative blood transfers, and CE analyses repeatability of ≤ 7.2%, after the whole DBS processing.

Advances in Sample PreparationVol. 16
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Analytical Chemistry (CZ), Brno University of Technology (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.