What, Then, Is Critical Thinking? Insights from a Longitudinal Study of Critical Thinking

ABSTRACT Papers were systematically gathered from the same college students at different times throughout their undergraduate education. These papers were scored by faculty in other institutions on AAC&U’s critical thinking rubric as part of the association’s Scoring Collaborative. Students’ critical thinking scores were used in addition to GPA as another metric of learning. Critical thinking scores were incorporated into ongoing assessment activities, which include the administration of psychological survey instruments throughout students’ undergraduate experience. This approach enabled analyses to identify antecedent psychoeducational variables associated with successful critical thinking performance, improvement in that performance, and students’ ability to meet the expectations established by the university under study. The results of this longitudinal, mixed-methods study provide insights into students’ growth in critical thinking over time and the role “productive struggle” plays in promoting desirable levels of critical thinking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5325/jasseinsteffe.15.1-2.0019
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What, Then, Is Critical Thinking? Insights from a Longitudinal Study of Critical Thinking

Brian Darrow, Lacey Corey Brown, K. Gupta, JT Torres et al.
Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

What, Then, Is Critical Thinking? Insights from a Longitudinal Study of Critical Thinking

Brian Darrow, Lacey Corey Brown, K. Gupta, JT Torres, Michael Ben‐Avie
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Papers were systematically gathered from the same college students at different times throughout their undergraduate education. These papers were scored by faculty in other institutions on AAC&U’s critical thinking rubric as part of the association’s Scoring Collaborative. Students’ critical thinking scores were used in addition to GPA as another metric of learning. Critical thinking scores were incorporated into ongoing assessment activities, which include the administration of psychological survey instruments throughout students’ undergraduate experience. This approach enabled analyses to identify antecedent psychoeducational variables associated with successful critical thinking performance, improvement in that performance, and students’ ability to meet the expectations established by the university under study. The results of this longitudinal, mixed-methods study provide insights into students’ growth in critical thinking over time and the role “productive struggle” plays in promoting desirable levels of critical thinking.

Journal of Assessment and Institutional EffectivenessVol. 15(1-2)
Central Connecticut State University (US), Washington and Lee University (US), Quinnipiac University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What, Then, Is Critical Thinking? Insights from a Longitudinal Study of Critical Thinking — Brian Darrow, Lacey Corey Brown, et al. · Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS