CLINICAL JUSTIFICATION OF THE USE OF CHONDROITIN SULFATE IN DENTAL IMPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WITH LOW OSTEOGENIC POTENTIAL

Relevance. Modern dental implantology has achieved significant success, but patients with metabolic disorders, especially type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), are still a complex category characterized by a high risk of developing osseointegration disorders and postoperative complications. In such patients, there is a decrease in osteogenic potential, deterioration of regenerative processes and increased bone resorption. In this regard, an urgent task is to find and implement additional methods that help improve osseointegration. One of the promising directions is considered to be the use of chondroitin sulfate, a natural biopolymer with proven osteotropic, anti-inflammatory and regenerative properties capable of stimulating bone metabolism and improving the microenvironment in the implantation area. Aim. To conduct a clinical evaluation of the effectiveness of the combined use of chondroitin sulfate (systemic and local) in dental implantation in patients with DM2 and signs of reduced osteogenic potential. Materials and methods. The study included 72 patients with a verified diagnosis of DM2 and signs of osteopenia (type D3–D4 according to the Misch classification). The participants were divided into three groups: O1 — combined use of chondroitin sulfate (oral and topical), O2 — systemic therapy only, K — control group without chondroitin sulfate. Over the course of 12 months, hygienic and periodontal status, ISQ indices, bone density (in HU), and marginal resorption were assessed using RFA, CBCT, and visiography techniques. Results. The O1 group showed the best clinical results: an increase in ISQ was +16.91%, bone density increased by 18.3%, and marginal bone resorption was minimal — 0.10 mm. The implant survival rate was 100% in the experimental groups and 95.8% in the control group. The developed protocol confirmed its high clinical efficacy and osteoprotective effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The actual problems in dentistry
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18481/2077-7566-2025-21-3-145-152
Primary Topic
Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CLINICAL JUSTIFICATION OF THE USE OF CHONDROITIN SULFATE IN DENTAL IMPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WITH LOW OSTEOGENIC POTENTIAL

Svetlana Matelo, Samvel V. Apresyan, Alexander Stepanov, Leonid Yudin et al.
The actual problems in dentistry
Neurological Disorders and Treatments
article

CLINICAL JUSTIFICATION OF THE USE OF CHONDROITIN SULFATE IN DENTAL IMPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WITH LOW OSTEOGENIC POTENTIAL

Svetlana Matelo, Samvel V. Apresyan, Alexander Stepanov, Leonid Yudin, Mirza Alikov
article en

Abstract

Relevance. Modern dental implantology has achieved significant success, but patients with metabolic disorders, especially type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), are still a complex category characterized by a high risk of developing osseointegration disorders and postoperative complications. In such patients, there is a decrease in osteogenic potential, deterioration of regenerative processes and increased bone resorption. In this regard, an urgent task is to find and implement additional methods that help improve osseointegration. One of the promising directions is considered to be the use of chondroitin sulfate, a natural biopolymer with proven osteotropic, anti-inflammatory and regenerative properties capable of stimulating bone metabolism and improving the microenvironment in the implantation area. Aim. To conduct a clinical evaluation of the effectiveness of the combined use of chondroitin sulfate (systemic and local) in dental implantation in patients with DM2 and signs of reduced osteogenic potential. Materials and methods. The study included 72 patients with a verified diagnosis of DM2 and signs of osteopenia (type D3–D4 according to the Misch classification). The participants were divided into three groups: O1 — combined use of chondroitin sulfate (oral and topical), O2 — systemic therapy only, K — control group without chondroitin sulfate. Over the course of 12 months, hygienic and periodontal status, ISQ indices, bone density (in HU), and marginal resorption were assessed using RFA, CBCT, and visiography techniques. Results. The O1 group showed the best clinical results: an increase in ISQ was +16.91%, bone density increased by 18.3%, and marginal bone resorption was minimal — 0.10 mm. The implant survival rate was 100% in the experimental groups and 95.8% in the control group. The developed protocol confirmed its high clinical efficacy and osteoprotective effect.

The actual problems in dentistryVol. 21(3)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Neurological Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.