The Remediation of Fact-Checks on Social Media: Insights from a Multi-Platform Content Analysis
The rise of social media has escalated the spread of misinformation, and the practice of fact-checking has become a key tool in the fight against it. Over time, the practice of fact-checking evolved and in recent years, fact-checking practices have shifted to social media platforms. However, social media’s unique logic requires fact-checkers to adapt—or “remediate” - their content to these platforms, which can prove to be challenging. Research is currently lacking on how fact-checks are remediated to this new format. This study examined how fact-checking organizations remediate their website fact-checks to different social media platforms, through an extensive content analysis (N = 14.891) of website and social media fact-checks published by eight fact-checking organizations (Belgium, the US, the UK). Results show that transfer rates from the website to social media are generally high, but that there are differences across organizations. Fact-checks are diffused to social media with an initial widespread burst across platforms but are often not re-shared after this. Reposting of content happens mostly within the platform, with reposts across platforms occurring less often. There is a prevalence of hard news topics both in website fact-checks as on social media, indicating no trend of news softening.
Authors
- Bart Hermans (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0079-3408)
- Michaël Opgenhaffen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1729-3578)
- Cato Waeterloos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6059-8567)
Institutions
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- Hasselt University (BE)
- KU Leuven (BE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Digital Journalism
- Published
- 2025-10-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2025.2580979
- Primary Topic
- Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00