Religion and science, faith and medicine: A worldviews approach to English evangelical medics’ perspectives

This article examines how twenty-three English evangelical Christian medics experienced the interface between religion and medical science. Using qualitative autobiographical and interview data, it shows this interface was characterized by harmony and tension, dialogue and uncertainty, often in combination. These characterizations both echo and diverge from Ian Barbour’s fourfold model, likewise challenging religion and science’s presumed irreconcilability, and that of evangelical Christianity and medical science. The article also reinforces the importance of not homogenizing these categories when exploring their interface. The article argues that a “worldviews” approach guards against such homogenization, instead predisposing researchers to anticipate complexity. It presents both religion and science as diverse, multifaceted worldviews complexly appropriated by individuals, exploring how they interact in light of lived experience. This advances worldview studies’ renaissance by exploring and conceptualizing people’s engagements with two worldviews which are not straightforwardly compatible, a facility which has been gestured towards, but not yet widely utilized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Research on Religion
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20503032251381312
Primary Topic
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Religion and science, faith and medicine: A worldviews approach to English evangelical medics’ perspectives

Jennifer Riley
Critical Research on Religion
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
article

Religion and science, faith and medicine: A worldviews approach to English evangelical medics’ perspectives

Jennifer Riley
article en

Abstract

This article examines how twenty-three English evangelical Christian medics experienced the interface between religion and medical science. Using qualitative autobiographical and interview data, it shows this interface was characterized by harmony and tension, dialogue and uncertainty, often in combination. These characterizations both echo and diverge from Ian Barbour’s fourfold model, likewise challenging religion and science’s presumed irreconcilability, and that of evangelical Christianity and medical science. The article also reinforces the importance of not homogenizing these categories when exploring their interface. The article argues that a “worldviews” approach guards against such homogenization, instead predisposing researchers to anticipate complexity. It presents both religion and science as diverse, multifaceted worldviews complexly appropriated by individuals, exploring how they interact in light of lived experience. This advances worldview studies’ renaissance by exploring and conceptualizing people’s engagements with two worldviews which are not straightforwardly compatible, a facility which has been gestured towards, but not yet widely utilized.

Critical Research on Religion
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.