River Network Routing and Discharge Partitioning on a Multichannel River Network

Abstract The advent of global river network data products and river routing models (RRMs) has resulted in substantial improvements to our understanding of the quantity and movement of water in Earth's rivers. However, the majority of vector‐based global river networks are derived from digital elevation models (DEMs) that do not allow representation of river network complexities such as bifurcations and divergences. Resulting discharge estimates may therefore not accurately reflect the movement of water. Satellite remote sensing has enabled the development of river networks that represent increased river complexities—albeit with limited topological accuracy—a necessary ingredient for river routing. Here, we describe an algorithm that generates globally consistent topology for a river network with optically‐derived centerlines—producing new and updated attributes—and adapt an existing vector‐based RRM to handle the added complexity in connectivity (i.e., divergences) via discharge partitioning. We apply the adapted RRM to runoff from an ensemble of land surface models for two case study Pfafstetter level‐2 basins (the Amazon and Mackenzie Rivers) to estimate 3‐hourly discharge between 2015 and 2024. We show that the adapted RRM is able to partition discharge at divergences, which results in a mean increase of 0.75 in Kling‐Gupta Efficiency and 0.31 in correlation coefficient at 6 gauges located on a divergence when compared to routing on a traditional DEM‐derived river network (i.e., contains no divergences). By comparing the resulting hydrographs from the optically‐ and DEM‐derived river networks, we find that flow waves travel faster through portions of river networks where divergences are accurately represented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025wr041417
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

River Network Routing and Discharge Partitioning on a Multichannel River Network

Elyssa L. Collins, Emma J. Johnson, Tamlin M. Pavelsky, Cédric Hervé David et al.
1 citations
Water Resources Research
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
article

River Network Routing and Discharge Partitioning on a Multichannel River Network

Elyssa L. Collins, Emma J. Johnson, Tamlin M. Pavelsky, Cédric Hervé David, Elizabeth H. Altenau, Augusto Getirana
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The advent of global river network data products and river routing models (RRMs) has resulted in substantial improvements to our understanding of the quantity and movement of water in Earth's rivers. However, the majority of vector‐based global river networks are derived from digital elevation models (DEMs) that do not allow representation of river network complexities such as bifurcations and divergences. Resulting discharge estimates may therefore not accurately reflect the movement of water. Satellite remote sensing has enabled the development of river networks that represent increased river complexities—albeit with limited topological accuracy—a necessary ingredient for river routing. Here, we describe an algorithm that generates globally consistent topology for a river network with optically‐derived centerlines—producing new and updated attributes—and adapt an existing vector‐based RRM to handle the added complexity in connectivity (i.e., divergences) via discharge partitioning. We apply the adapted RRM to runoff from an ensemble of land surface models for two case study Pfafstetter level‐2 basins (the Amazon and Mackenzie Rivers) to estimate 3‐hourly discharge between 2015 and 2024. We show that the adapted RRM is able to partition discharge at divergences, which results in a mean increase of 0.75 in Kling‐Gupta Efficiency and 0.31 in correlation coefficient at 6 gauges located on a divergence when compared to routing on a traditional DEM‐derived river network (i.e., contains no divergences). By comparing the resulting hydrographs from the optically‐ and DEM‐derived river networks, we find that flow waves travel faster through portions of river networks where divergences are accurately represented.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 61(11)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Science Applications International Corporation (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.