Exploring How the Psychological Safety of Patients Is Impacted by Restrictive Practices in Inpatient Mental Healthcare: A Qualitative Study

Restrictive practices are used to contain risk and maintain physical safety on inpatient mental health wards, but have been shown to negatively impact patient well-being and trust. Researchers and professionals have suggested that inpatient mental healthcare focuses on physical safety at the expense of psychological safety. The relationship between restrictive practices and psychological safety has not yet been explored. This study aimed to explore the impacts of receiving and witnessing restrictive practices on psychological safety, to understand what could be done to make restrictive practices psychologically safe. Eighteen semi-structured interviews were carried out with former patients (aged 20-60 years) who had been discharged for longer than 6 months from adult inpatient mental healthcare in the United Kingdom. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Four themes were generated: (1) Reactive over proactive care: seeing the behaviour and not exploring the reason, (2) A chaotic environment cannot provide safety for patients and staff, (3) Psychological impact of the (perceived) power imbalance between staff and patients and (4) Emotionally all in it together, for better or worse. The results support that physical risk is heightened in inpatient settings, but containing this should not come at the expense of psychological safety. Supportive communication and giving small acts of control to patients should be prioritised to enhance the psychological safety of patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.70148
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring How the Psychological Safety of Patients Is Impacted by Restrictive Practices in Inpatient Mental Healthcare: A Qualitative Study

Chris Keyworth, John Baker, Bethany Griffin, Katharina Sophie Vogt et al.
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

Exploring How the Psychological Safety of Patients Is Impacted by Restrictive Practices in Inpatient Mental Healthcare: A Qualitative Study

Chris Keyworth, John Baker, Bethany Griffin, Katharina Sophie Vogt, JUDITH MOORE JOHNSON, Emily Mizen
article en

Abstract

Restrictive practices are used to contain risk and maintain physical safety on inpatient mental health wards, but have been shown to negatively impact patient well-being and trust. Researchers and professionals have suggested that inpatient mental healthcare focuses on physical safety at the expense of psychological safety. The relationship between restrictive practices and psychological safety has not yet been explored. This study aimed to explore the impacts of receiving and witnessing restrictive practices on psychological safety, to understand what could be done to make restrictive practices psychologically safe. Eighteen semi-structured interviews were carried out with former patients (aged 20-60 years) who had been discharged for longer than 6 months from adult inpatient mental healthcare in the United Kingdom. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Four themes were generated: (1) Reactive over proactive care: seeing the behaviour and not exploring the reason, (2) A chaotic environment cannot provide safety for patients and staff, (3) Psychological impact of the (perceived) power imbalance between staff and patients and (4) Emotionally all in it together, for better or worse. The results support that physical risk is heightened in inpatient settings, but containing this should not come at the expense of psychological safety. Supportive communication and giving small acts of control to patients should be prioritised to enhance the psychological safety of patients.

International Journal of Mental Health NursingVol. 34(6)
University of East Anglia (GB), University of Leeds (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), Bradford Royal Infirmary (GB), University of Manchester (GB), UNSW Sydney (AU), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, University of Leeds, Patient Safety Translational Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.