Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Effects Using Three Types of Maxillary Protraction Protocols
The orthopaedic effects of BAFM and MARPE/FM were greater with maxillary protraction and intermaxillary relationship improvement than RPE/FM after protraction. Midface traction effects with MARPE/FM were less than with BAFM. However, MARPE/FM was more effective in preventing mesial movement and extrusion of the maxillary first molars.
Authors
- Dong‐Hwa Chung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3633-8209)
- Mo‐Hyeon Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5592-3820)
- Da‐In Kim
- Sang‐Min Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1843-7406)
- Jae Hyun Park (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3134-6878)
- Jin‐Woo Lee
Institutions
- Kyung Hee University (KR)
- A.T. Still University (US)
- Dankook University (KR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research
- Published
- 2025-10-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70050
- Primary Topic
- Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00