Engagement and retention with remote monitoring in psoriasis: Findings from the <scp>mySkin</scp> study

Longitudinal remote monitoring enables real-time tracking of outcomes in individuals with long-term immune-mediated inflammatory conditions, with the potential to inform personalized healthcare and enhance research data collection efficiency. In dermatology, self-taken photographs provide objective information complementary to patient-reported outcomes. As willingness and ability to engage with remote monitoring may vary,1 identifying factors influencing participation is essential for equitable care delivery. We examined demographic/clinical factors associated with engagement and retention with a remote monitoring platform in mySkin, a longitudinal UK-wide cohort study of adults with psoriasis investigating environmental determinants of disease onset and worsening.2 Participants self-enrolled via myskin.org (17 June 2023–present) and completed 3-monthly surveys for 12 months, with the option to submit self-taken photographs. Demographic/clinical data and self-reported triggers to psoriasis onset and worsening were collected.2 Uni/multivariate analyses identified factors influencing participation, with candidate factors based on prior research3, 4 and study team consensus. Of the 864 individuals completing ≥1 survey (data extracted 26 November 2024), most were of White ethnicity (89.9%) and female (62.3%) (Table 1). At baseline, 53.0% agreed to submit optional photographs. Agreement was more likely among younger individuals (p = 0.01), those with shorter psoriasis duration (p < 0.001), higher self-reported severity (p < 0.001) and no psoriatic arthritis (p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, self-reported severity remained significant (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.81–3.90). Of those who agreed, 41.7% submitted photographs. Submission was more likely among unemployed individuals (p = 0.01) and those with non-facial psoriasis (p = 0.03). Retention at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months was 62.9%, 58.4%, 52.7% and 46.3%, respectively (Figure 1). Older age (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.07–1.12), unemployment (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.19–3.46; primarily due to retirement) and self-reported mental health comorbidities (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.20–3.37) were associated with higher retention. Participants with self-reported clear/nearly clear skin (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.58–4.48) or mild psoriasis (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.33–3.94) had higher retention than those with moderate/moderate–severe/severe psoriasis. Our findings highlight variation in engagement with remote monitoring across patient groups. Consistent with previous studies, older individuals5-7 and those with well-controlled disease6 showed higher retention. As more individuals achieve clear/nearly clear skin with effective biologic therapies, remote monitoring could reduce their healthcare burden while releasing clinical capacity for those in need. In inflammatory arthritis, a systematic review found remote monitoring reduced face-to-face visits.8 Prior psoriasis research has shown that teledermatology can achieve clinical outcomes equivalent to in-person care, supporting its integration into real-world practice.9 Our data indicate that younger, employed patients with severe psoriasis are more likely to disengage over time. While not harder to reach initially, they may require tailored support to sustain participation, such as clinician-supported onboarding and personalized feedback to enhance clinician–patient communication.3, 5 Advances in artificial intelligence offer additional opportunities, with potential to monitor engagement patterns, detect early disengagement and deliver targeted support to improve retention.10 In research settings, financial incentives may boost engagement.5 Our findings underscore a need to identify barriers to photograph submission, which may include time constraints, technological issues and digital literacy. Stigma and privacy concerns may be important, as submission rates were higher among individuals with non-facial psoriasis. Interviews with engaged/disengaged participants could yield deeper insights into patient behaviours. Strengths of this study include its large sample size, UK-wide recruitment and longitudinal design. Limitations include the predominance of female participants, underrepresentation from ethnic minority groups and English-only surveys. Ascertainment of clinician perspectives will also be an important future focus. As a research study, findings may not fully generalize to real-world clinical practice. Digital transformation in healthcare relies on patient engagement and retention. Our study of longitudinal remote monitoring in psoriasis demonstrates variation in retention across patient groups, highlighting the need to tailor digital tools to optimise engagement with hard to reach and underserved groups, supporting equitable real-world implementation. W.Y. is an NIHR Doctoral Training Fellow (NIHR304617). S.K.M. is supported by an NIHR Advanced Fellowship (NIHR302258) and C.H.S. by an NIHR Senior Investigator Award. Support for this work was also received from the Psoriasis Association (RE18933). C.H.S. reports departmental research funding from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, UCB and Sanofi outside the submitted work, and serves as an investigator in EU-IMI consortia involving multiple industry partners (see biomap-imi.eu and hippocrates-imi.eu for details). S.K.M. reports departmental income from AbbVie, Almirall, Eli Lilly, Leo, Novartis, Sanofi and UCB outside the submitted work. L.M. has received consulting fees, speaker fees or support for attending meetings or travel from AbbVie, Alliance, Sanofi, Almirall, BMS, Dermal, Johnson & Johnson, Leo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, UCB and Pfizer. J.N.B. has attended advisory boards and/or received consultancy fees and/or spoken at sponsored symposia, and/or received grant funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyers-Squibb, Johnson and Johnson, Lilly, Novartis and UCB. The remaining authors declare no competing interests. The mySkin study has received approval from the HRA and REC (reference number 22/NI/0193). All patients provided written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to linkage with other health resources as per current contracts. De-identified data are potentially available subject to request.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.70153
Primary Topic
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engagement and retention with remote monitoring in psoriasis: Findings from the mySkin study

Treasa Jiang, Sarah Chapman, Madeline Kroah‐Hartman, Wei Tan et al.
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
article

Engagement and retention with remote monitoring in psoriasis: Findings from the mySkin study

Treasa Jiang, Sarah Chapman, Madeline Kroah‐Hartman, Wei Tan, Alexandra Paolino, Satveer K. Mahil, Kingsley Powell, Weiyu Ye, John Y.W. Lee, Sam Norton, Bolaji Coker, Juliet N. Barker, Niamh Dooley, Helen McAteer, Manpreet K. Sagoo, Teresa Tsakok, Catherine Smith, Jade Pizzato, Freya Jackson‐Duffy, G Sewell, Camille Lancelot, Lucy Moorhead, John Weinman
article en

Abstract

Longitudinal remote monitoring enables real-time tracking of outcomes in individuals with long-term immune-mediated inflammatory conditions, with the potential to inform personalized healthcare and enhance research data collection efficiency. In dermatology, self-taken photographs provide objective information complementary to patient-reported outcomes. As willingness and ability to engage with remote monitoring may vary,1 identifying factors influencing participation is essential for equitable care delivery. We examined demographic/clinical factors associated with engagement and retention with a remote monitoring platform in mySkin, a longitudinal UK-wide cohort study of adults with psoriasis investigating environmental determinants of disease onset and worsening.2 Participants self-enrolled via myskin.org (17 June 2023–present) and completed 3-monthly surveys for 12 months, with the option to submit self-taken photographs. Demographic/clinical data and self-reported triggers to psoriasis onset and worsening were collected.2 Uni/multivariate analyses identified factors influencing participation, with candidate factors based on prior research3, 4 and study team consensus. Of the 864 individuals completing ≥1 survey (data extracted 26 November 2024), most were of White ethnicity (89.9%) and female (62.3%) (Table 1). At baseline, 53.0% agreed to submit optional photographs. Agreement was more likely among younger individuals (p = 0.01), those with shorter psoriasis duration (p < 0.001), higher self-reported severity (p < 0.001) and no psoriatic arthritis (p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, self-reported severity remained significant (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.81–3.90). Of those who agreed, 41.7% submitted photographs. Submission was more likely among unemployed individuals (p = 0.01) and those with non-facial psoriasis (p = 0.03). Retention at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months was 62.9%, 58.4%, 52.7% and 46.3%, respectively (Figure 1). Older age (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.07–1.12), unemployment (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.19–3.46; primarily due to retirement) and self-reported mental health comorbidities (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.20–3.37) were associated with higher retention. Participants with self-reported clear/nearly clear skin (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.58–4.48) or mild psoriasis (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.33–3.94) had higher retention than those with moderate/moderate–severe/severe psoriasis. Our findings highlight variation in engagement with remote monitoring across patient groups. Consistent with previous studies, older individuals5-7 and those with well-controlled disease6 showed higher retention. As more individuals achieve clear/nearly clear skin with effective biologic therapies, remote monitoring could reduce their healthcare burden while releasing clinical capacity for those in need. In inflammatory arthritis, a systematic review found remote monitoring reduced face-to-face visits.8 Prior psoriasis research has shown that teledermatology can achieve clinical outcomes equivalent to in-person care, supporting its integration into real-world practice.9 Our data indicate that younger, employed patients with severe psoriasis are more likely to disengage over time. While not harder to reach initially, they may require tailored support to sustain participation, such as clinician-supported onboarding and personalized feedback to enhance clinician–patient communication.3, 5 Advances in artificial intelligence offer additional opportunities, with potential to monitor engagement patterns, detect early disengagement and deliver targeted support to improve retention.10 In research settings, financial incentives may boost engagement.5 Our findings underscore a need to identify barriers to photograph submission, which may include time constraints, technological issues and digital literacy. Stigma and privacy concerns may be important, as submission rates were higher among individuals with non-facial psoriasis. Interviews with engaged/disengaged participants could yield deeper insights into patient behaviours. Strengths of this study include its large sample size, UK-wide recruitment and longitudinal design. Limitations include the predominance of female participants, underrepresentation from ethnic minority groups and English-only surveys. Ascertainment of clinician perspectives will also be an important future focus. As a research study, findings may not fully generalize to real-world clinical practice. Digital transformation in healthcare relies on patient engagement and retention. Our study of longitudinal remote monitoring in psoriasis demonstrates variation in retention across patient groups, highlighting the need to tailor digital tools to optimise engagement with hard to reach and underserved groups, supporting equitable real-world implementation. W.Y. is an NIHR Doctoral Training Fellow (NIHR304617). S.K.M. is supported by an NIHR Advanced Fellowship (NIHR302258) and C.H.S. by an NIHR Senior Investigator Award. Support for this work was also received from the Psoriasis Association (RE18933). C.H.S. reports departmental research funding from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, UCB and Sanofi outside the submitted work, and serves as an investigator in EU-IMI consortia involving multiple industry partners (see biomap-imi.eu and hippocrates-imi.eu for details). S.K.M. reports departmental income from AbbVie, Almirall, Eli Lilly, Leo, Novartis, Sanofi and UCB outside the submitted work. L.M. has received consulting fees, speaker fees or support for attending meetings or travel from AbbVie, Alliance, Sanofi, Almirall, BMS, Dermal, Johnson & Johnson, Leo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, UCB and Pfizer. J.N.B. has attended advisory boards and/or received consultancy fees and/or spoken at sponsored symposia, and/or received grant funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyers-Squibb, Johnson and Johnson, Lilly, Novartis and UCB. The remaining authors declare no competing interests. The mySkin study has received approval from the HRA and REC (reference number 22/NI/0193). All patients provided written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to linkage with other health resources as per current contracts. De-identified data are potentially available subject to request.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and VenereologyVol. 40(4)
University of Groningen (NL), King's College London (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Psoriasis Association (GB)
King's College London
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.