Bridging Portability and Performance in Sparse Tensor Computations Using SYCL

ABSTRACT Sparse tensors have become prevalent data structures in multiple applications, such as medical imaging and machine learning, making operations that decompose them, that is, creating smaller structures that retain most of the original information, essential. Two of the most commonly used tensor decomposition methods are the Canonical Polyadic and Tucker Decomposition, with the most time‐consuming operations being the MTTKRP and TTM‐chain, respectively. Modern computing platforms combine multiple devices with different architectures to achieve unprecedented levels of performance, creating an environment where portability is as important as performance. To tackle this challenge, this work proposes SYCL‐based MTTKRP and TTM‐chain approaches for sparse tensors, which are portable to any CPU or GPU, extending previous literature by handling mode‐4 and mode‐5 tensors and tackling the TTM‐chain operation as a whole, allowing for further optimizations. The experimental results show that the proposed approaches present linear to superlinear scalability as the problem size grows and outperform the portable state‐of‐the‐art by 4.9× on average.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.70369
Primary Topic
Tensor decomposition and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging Portability and Performance in Sparse Tensor Computations Using SYCL

Aleksandar Ilić, Miguel Graça, Leonel Sousa, Filipe Borralho et al.
Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience
Tensor decomposition and applications
article

Bridging Portability and Performance in Sparse Tensor Computations Using SYCL

Aleksandar Ilić, Miguel Graça, Leonel Sousa, Filipe Borralho, Daniel Pacheco
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sparse tensors have become prevalent data structures in multiple applications, such as medical imaging and machine learning, making operations that decompose them, that is, creating smaller structures that retain most of the original information, essential. Two of the most commonly used tensor decomposition methods are the Canonical Polyadic and Tucker Decomposition, with the most time‐consuming operations being the MTTKRP and TTM‐chain, respectively. Modern computing platforms combine multiple devices with different architectures to achieve unprecedented levels of performance, creating an environment where portability is as important as performance. To tackle this challenge, this work proposes SYCL‐based MTTKRP and TTM‐chain approaches for sparse tensors, which are portable to any CPU or GPU, extending previous literature by handling mode‐4 and mode‐5 tensors and tackling the TTM‐chain operation as a whole, allowing for further optimizations. The experimental results show that the proposed approaches present linear to superlinear scalability as the problem size grows and outperform the portable state‐of‐the‐art by 4.9× on average.

Concurrency and Computation Practice and ExperienceVol. 37(27-28)
Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Investigação e Desenvolvimento (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Tensor decomposition and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bridging Portability and Performance in Sparse Tensor Computations Using SYCL — Aleksandar Ilić, Miguel Graça, et al. · Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS