Wide-Angle Lung Experiment Segmentation (WALES): Effective quantitative assessment of lung pathology in model systems

For preclinical studies, the standard practice for evaluating lung injury usually involves an assessment of pulmonary histopathology by a certified pathologist. This is typically accomplished by light microscopy using a semiquantitative four-point scale. In contrast, automated image analysis software allows a more quantitative assessment, though inherent limitations with such automated programs can produce misleading conclusions. For example, specific imaging features may be incorrectly scored or classified within the specimen because of the complex architecture and heterogeneous structures present in the lung. In addition, tissue processing and handling may further introduce artifacts and inconsistencies that affect automated analysis. To address these limitations, we developed a lung image analysis program, Wide-Angle Lung Experiment Segmentation (WALES), which uses Meta's Segment Anything Model to provide semiautomated masking and relative density analysis to efficiently quantify lung injury. Density analysis using WALES effectively delineated varying severities of lung injury, not achieved using more standard methods. WALES is widely applicable for many preclinical lung injury models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Advances
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ady2927
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wide-Angle Lung Experiment Segmentation (WALES): Effective quantitative assessment of lung pathology in model systems

Eric Hernady, Angela M. Groves, Brian Marples, Mark Racz et al.
Science Advances
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
article

Wide-Angle Lung Experiment Segmentation (WALES): Effective quantitative assessment of lung pathology in model systems

Eric Hernady, Angela M. Groves, Brian Marples, Mark Racz, Nicole D. Paris, Lewis J. Drakeley, Uzair Tahamid Siam
article en

Abstract

For preclinical studies, the standard practice for evaluating lung injury usually involves an assessment of pulmonary histopathology by a certified pathologist. This is typically accomplished by light microscopy using a semiquantitative four-point scale. In contrast, automated image analysis software allows a more quantitative assessment, though inherent limitations with such automated programs can produce misleading conclusions. For example, specific imaging features may be incorrectly scored or classified within the specimen because of the complex architecture and heterogeneous structures present in the lung. In addition, tissue processing and handling may further introduce artifacts and inconsistencies that affect automated analysis. To address these limitations, we developed a lung image analysis program, Wide-Angle Lung Experiment Segmentation (WALES), which uses Meta's Segment Anything Model to provide semiautomated masking and relative density analysis to efficiently quantify lung injury. Density analysis using WALES effectively delineated varying severities of lung injury, not achieved using more standard methods. WALES is widely applicable for many preclinical lung injury models.

Science AdvancesVol. 11(44)
Harvard University (US), University of Rochester Medical Center (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.