Are crop fields pharmacies for megaherbivores? From ecophysiological studies of elephant ( <i>Loxodonta cyclotis</i> ) crop raiders in Gabon

Abstract Damage to crops is a major cause of human–elephant conflict (HEC) in elephant range states. Elephant crop raiding drives farmers' resentment against elephants and reduces local community support for wildlife conservation. While elephant crop raiding ecology is well studied, further investigations on HEC mitigation strategies are still needed. Thus, there is a need to focus on less investigated areas, such as the physiological drivers of elephant crop‐raiding behaviour, using multidisciplinary sciences. Two physiological proxies, gastrointestinal parasite infestations (GPI) and faecal glucocorticoid metabolite (fGCM) concentrations, common in animal ecophysiology, were used to help understand differences or motivations in the preferences of crops by elephant raiders. The results show, for the first time, that forest elephants may increase the frequency of crop raiding according to GPI, indicating a self‐medication behaviour. Increases in parasitism prevalence (PP) and parasitism intensity (PI) in sampled boluses led to 28% and 0.16% more intakes of all crops, respectively. Parasitism prevalence (PP) increases in elephant boluses also led to 16% and 25% more bananas and papaya intakes, respectively, while PI increases in boluses led to 0.1% more intakes of both bananas and papaya plants. No such predictions were found for other crops (cassava and palm plant), nor for natural food species intakes. Furthermore, fGCM concentrations were not related to elephant crop raiding. Results highlight a trade‐off between the benefit of elephants raiding crops and the danger of encountering farmers by adopting nocturnal crop‐raiding behaviours. Practical implication . We propose that elephants may choose specific plant parts while raiding crops as a self‐medication behaviour. We further discuss the importance of forest elephant conservation as they are not only forest engineers but also appear to be self‐medication specialists, which could possibly help humans cope with present and future health issues. Further understanding of that self‐medication behaviour can help communities cohabiting with forest elephants to focus on the broader health benefits rather than solely on the immediate issue of crop damage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.70141
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are crop fields pharmacies for megaherbivores? From ecophysiological studies of elephant ( Loxodonta cyclotis ) crop raiders in Gabon

Annick Lindén, Steeve Ngama, Janine L. Brown, Steve Paris et al.
Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Are crop fields pharmacies for megaherbivores? From ecophysiological studies of elephant ( Loxodonta cyclotis ) crop raiders in Gabon

Annick Lindén, Steeve Ngama, Janine L. Brown, Steve Paris, Jean‐Louis Doucet, Jérôme Bindelle, John R. Poulsen, Auguste Ndoutoume Ndong, Cédric Vermeulen, Philippe Lejeune, Jean‐Luc Hornick, Mireille Johnson, Lisa Körte, Jacques François Mavoungou, Monique Bouanga Banfoui epse Ngama
article en

Abstract

Abstract Damage to crops is a major cause of human–elephant conflict (HEC) in elephant range states. Elephant crop raiding drives farmers' resentment against elephants and reduces local community support for wildlife conservation. While elephant crop raiding ecology is well studied, further investigations on HEC mitigation strategies are still needed. Thus, there is a need to focus on less investigated areas, such as the physiological drivers of elephant crop‐raiding behaviour, using multidisciplinary sciences. Two physiological proxies, gastrointestinal parasite infestations (GPI) and faecal glucocorticoid metabolite (fGCM) concentrations, common in animal ecophysiology, were used to help understand differences or motivations in the preferences of crops by elephant raiders. The results show, for the first time, that forest elephants may increase the frequency of crop raiding according to GPI, indicating a self‐medication behaviour. Increases in parasitism prevalence (PP) and parasitism intensity (PI) in sampled boluses led to 28% and 0.16% more intakes of all crops, respectively. Parasitism prevalence (PP) increases in elephant boluses also led to 16% and 25% more bananas and papaya intakes, respectively, while PI increases in boluses led to 0.1% more intakes of both bananas and papaya plants. No such predictions were found for other crops (cassava and palm plant), nor for natural food species intakes. Furthermore, fGCM concentrations were not related to elephant crop raiding. Results highlight a trade‐off between the benefit of elephants raiding crops and the danger of encountering farmers by adopting nocturnal crop‐raiding behaviours. Practical implication . We propose that elephants may choose specific plant parts while raiding crops as a self‐medication behaviour. We further discuss the importance of forest elephant conservation as they are not only forest engineers but also appear to be self‐medication specialists, which could possibly help humans cope with present and future health issues. Further understanding of that self‐medication behaviour can help communities cohabiting with forest elephants to focus on the broader health benefits rather than solely on the immediate issue of crop damage.

Ecological Solutions and EvidenceVol. 6(4)
The Nature Conservancy (US), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), University of Liège (BE), Duke University (US), Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech (BE), Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute (US), Libreville Hospital (GA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique (BF)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Agence Nationale Des Parcs Nationaux
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.