Assessing the Performance of Shipboard Instruments Used to Monitor Total Residual Oxidants

Shipboard ballast water management systems (BWMS) commonly employ chlorine or other oxidants to treat ballast. Oxidant-based BWMS inject these biocides to meet a concentration threshold or target value that is lethal to most aquatic organisms. Resulting concentrations of total residual oxidant (TRO) may span two orders of magnitude between initial doses (e.g., ~10 mg L−1) and discharged ballast, which must meet discharge limits (e.g., <0.1 mg L−1). Here, we evaluated three TRO instruments (two colorimetric-based and one based on amperometry) that have been integrated into BWMS for use in shipboard applications. Our study quantified accuracy and precision using test waters along a range of temperatures and salinities, using a pipe loop to mimic in-line shipboard operations, where the instruments continuously sample and analyze circulating water. Linear regression analysis compared the instruments to a standard reference method along a range of concentrations relevant to oxidant-based BWMS. In general, measurements from the TRO sensors showed strong linear relationships to the reference method, but slopes of these relationships were significantly <1 in all but one instance. Precision—measured as the coefficient of variation—ranged from 2 to 4%. These initial tests occurred on units shipped directly from the manufacturer, immediately following calibration and quality checks, and in a controlled laboratory environment. Thus, in this context, our evaluations represent a “best-case” outcome. We recommend that laboratory studies (as described here) be paired with endurance trials and in-service monitoring to include tests in a shipboard environment. These trials should evaluate TRO instruments that are integrated with BWMS and functioning under normal ship operations, measuring both high (treated ballast) and low (neutralized discharge) concentrations of TRO. Shipboard trials in concert with frequent calibration checks will reduce the risks of under- or overestimating TRO concentrations, as both outcomes may harm the environment.